Talk:Equal-step tuning: Difference between revisions
Dummy index (talk | contribs) →EDO tunings of some regular temperaments: new section |
Asked whether I should edit MMTM’s equal tuning pages |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
I'd like to see a description about the benefits of tuning the temperaments to Equal-step tunings, somewhere from there to here. I feel like there was something like that somewhere.--[[User:Dummy index|Dummy index]] ([[User talk:Dummy index|talk]]) 14:45, 20 April 2024 (UTC) | I'd like to see a description about the benefits of tuning the temperaments to Equal-step tunings, somewhere from there to here. I feel like there was something like that somewhere.--[[User:Dummy index|Dummy index]] ([[User talk:Dummy index|talk]]) 14:45, 20 April 2024 (UTC) | ||
== Bulk-editing the MMTM pages == | |||
A while back, Moremajorthanmajor made almost 500 pages for equal step tunings, which contained nothing except Infobox ET. Since then, we have marked them as stubs, but otherwise left them unchanged. | |||
I’m thinking that I would like add ED Intro and Harmonics in Equal to each of those pages. | |||
It wouldn’t fix the problem - they’d all still be stubs - but it would at least be a bit of a band aid to make the pages a bit more presentable. | |||
If I did this, I would mark all the edits as minor, to make it easy to filter them out of recent changes. | |||
Do you think this is a good idea, or would you rather I not do that? | |||
--[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 00:29, 28 September 2024 (UTC) |