Talk:Equal-step tuning: Difference between revisions

Dummy index (talk | contribs)
BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
Asked whether I should edit MMTM’s equal tuning pages
Line 16: Line 16:


I'd like to see a description about the benefits of tuning the temperaments to Equal-step tunings, somewhere from there to here. I feel like there was something like that somewhere.--[[User:Dummy index|Dummy index]] ([[User talk:Dummy index|talk]]) 14:45, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to see a description about the benefits of tuning the temperaments to Equal-step tunings, somewhere from there to here. I feel like there was something like that somewhere.--[[User:Dummy index|Dummy index]] ([[User talk:Dummy index|talk]]) 14:45, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
== Bulk-editing the MMTM pages ==
A while back, Moremajorthanmajor made almost 500 pages for equal step tunings, which contained nothing except Infobox ET. Since then, we have marked them as stubs, but otherwise left them unchanged.
I’m thinking that I would like add ED Intro and Harmonics in Equal to each of those pages.
It wouldn’t fix the problem - they’d all still be stubs - but it would at least be a bit of a band aid to make the pages a bit more presentable.
If I did this, I would mark all the edits as minor, to make it easy to filter them out of recent changes.
Do you think this is a good idea, or would you rather I not do that?
--[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 00:29, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Return to "Equal-step tuning" page.