Neji: Difference between revisions
Did not change any of the definitions or meanings of any of the concepts, but made it more clear that harmodal is the rule and non harmodal is the exception. Also listed “near equal” as an alternative interpretation of the acronym as it felt wrong to not include the original meaning of the acronym as one of its possible readings |
m Capitalisation and italicisation changes, removed some double negatives in what I said to make my writing less rambly |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
==== Harmodal vs non-harmodal nejis ==== | ==== Harmodal vs non-harmodal nejis ==== | ||
If the neji belongs to a | If the neji belongs to a "relatively not large" harmonic segment, and has a [[period]] equal to some positive integer harmonic (like the [[octave]], [[tritave]] or [[pentave]]), it is a "harmodal neji" (a contraction of "[[Harmonic mode|harmonic modal]] neji"). An octave is the most often used period. | ||
When the term "neji" is used, it is automatically assumed to be referring to a harmodal neji unless stated otherwise, in the same way that when "equal division" is used, it is assumed to be referring to "equal pitch division" unless otherwise stated. (That’s why there is no | When the term "neji" is used, it is automatically assumed to be referring to a harmodal neji unless stated otherwise, in the same way that when "equal division" is used, it is assumed to be referring to "equal pitch division" unless otherwise stated. (That’s why there is no p in edo, but there is an f in afdo). So, if a neji is harmodal, this is not usually explicitly stated. It is assumed. | ||
If a neji | If a neji belongs to a "relatively large" and/or non-periodic harmonic segment, then it is a "non-harmodal neji". In this case, it is advisable to explicitly name non-harmodal nejis as such, seeing as they are the exception rather than the rule. | ||
=== Detempering === | === Detempering === | ||
A more ([[JI subgroup]]) lattice-based approach is [[detempering]]. Detempering entails that the neji has the property of being [[epimorphic]] (obeys the appropriate mapping logic) with respect to a [[regular temperament]] for a tempered scale, equal-division or otherwise. | A more ([[JI subgroup]]) lattice-based approach is [[detempering]]. Detempering entails that the neji has the property of being [[epimorphic]] (obeys the appropriate mapping logic) with respect to a [[regular temperament]] for a tempered scale, equal-division or otherwise. | ||
Importantly and nontrivially, detempering is stricter than merely requiring that the target scale has | Importantly and nontrivially, detempering is stricter than merely requiring that the target scale ''has'' a scale logic (that is, a [[mapping]]), as many nejis may approximate the target scale without following its associated mapping. Only if a neji ''obeys'' the mapping, is it a detempering. | ||
=== Building edo nejis === | === Building edo nejis === |