Talk:EDO vs ET: Difference between revisions

Dummy index (talk | contribs)
Dummy index (talk | contribs)
 
Line 93: Line 93:
::::::::::: Let me know if you have further questions, and I'll do my best to answer. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 20:49, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
::::::::::: Let me know if you have further questions, and I'll do my best to answer. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 20:49, 26 June 2023 (UTC)


:::::::::::: So I tried to get a one-to-one correspondence with the output by "enfactoring" the input by 12, and the result was the 2<sup>1/12</sup> domain basis. But I have just come to the conclusion that this has no practical significance. Mapping the equal-step tuning to an exponential function is no different from the generator chain, and there is nothing to do in 1D domain. Barely the 2-limit case is only useful for explaining as a edge case. --[[User:Dummy index|Dummy index]] ([[User talk:Dummy index|talk]]) 15:00, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
:::::::::::: So I tried to get a one-to-one correspondence with the output by "enfactoring" the input by 12, and the result was the 2<sup>1/12</sup> domain basis. But I have just come to the conclusion that this has no practical significance. Mapping an exponential function to the equal-step tuning is no different from the generator chain, and there is nothing to do in 1D domain. Barely the 2-limit case is only useful for explaining as a edge case. --[[User:Dummy index|Dummy index]] ([[User talk:Dummy index|talk]]) 15:00, 28 June 2023 (UTC)


== "Supports" ==
== "Supports" ==
Return to "EDO vs ET" page.