No-threes subgroup temperaments: Difference between revisions

Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
"optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
"optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence
Line 280: Line 280:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~58/31 = 1084.628
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~58/31 = 1084.628


Vals: {{EDOs| 52, 1737, 1789 }}, ...
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 52, 1737, 1789 }}, ...


== French decimal ==
== French decimal ==
Line 293: Line 293:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~5/4 = 386.360
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~5/4 = 386.360


Vals: {{EDOs|205, 264, 469, 733, 997, 1261, 1525, 1789}}, ...
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1|205, 264, 469, 733, 997, 1261, 1525, 1789}}, ...


=== 2.5.7.11 subgroup ===
=== 2.5.7.11 subgroup ===
Line 304: Line 304:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~5/4 = 386.361
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~5/4 = 386.361


Vals: {{EDOs|264, 733}}, ...
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1|264, 733}}, ...


=== 2.5.7.11.13 subgroup ===
=== 2.5.7.11.13 subgroup ===
Line 315: Line 315:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~5/4 = 386.361
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~5/4 = 386.361


Vals: {{EDOs|1525, 1789}}, ...
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1|1525, 1789}}, ...


== Mabon ==
== Mabon ==
Line 328: Line 328:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~729/448 = 870.792
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~729/448 = 870.792


Vals: {{EDOs|7d, 11, 18d, 29, 40, 62}}, ...
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1|7d, 11, 18d, 29, 40, 62}}, ...


=== 2.9.7.11 subgroup ===
=== 2.9.7.11 subgroup ===
Line 351: Line 351:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~{{Monzo|381 0 -159 -4}} = 694.243
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~{{Monzo|381 0 -159 -4}} = 694.243


Vals: {{EDOs|382, 1025, 1407, 1789, 3196}}, ...
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1|382, 1025, 1407, 1789, 3196}}, ...


== Shipwreck ==
== Shipwreck ==