Talk:3L 1s (3/2-equivalent): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:34, 5 May 2023 view source BudjarnLambeth (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 21,262 edits Raised issue with the proposed name		Revision as of 02:38, 5 May 2023 view source BudjarnLambeth (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 21,262 edits m →Name confusion: Added signature Newer edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:
	Imagine if all 2/1-quivalent 5L 2s scales were called "Meantone". Imagine how confusing it would be if Superpyth[7] and Andromeda[7] and Flattone[7] were all called Meantone MOSes. It'd be a headache.		Imagine if all 2/1-quivalent 5L 2s scales were called "Meantone". Imagine how confusing it would be if Superpyth[7] and Andromeda[7] and Flattone[7] were all called Meantone MOSes. It'd be a headache.

	That kind of confusion is what could be created in the future if we name this abstract MOS pattern "Angel". "Angel" should be reserved specifically for the Angel temperament itself. Not for the MOS pattern in general.		That kind of confusion is what could be created in the future if we name this abstract MOS pattern "Angel". "Angel" should be reserved specifically for the Angel temperament itself. Not for the MOS pattern in general. --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 02:38, 5 May 2023 (UTC)