Talk:PFDO: Difference between revisions
→Possible ways to clarify and expand the article: new section |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
If this is intentional, it might be worth mentioning in the article that it gives the scale degrees counting down from the root, not up. | If this is intentional, it might be worth mentioning in the article that it gives the scale degrees counting down from the root, not up. | ||
If this is not intentional, and you are intending for the formula to give | If this is not intentional, and you are intending for the formula to give scale degrees in ''ascending'' order instead, then I think this formula would work: | ||
'''((b-a)/b + 2<sup>p</sup> * a/b)<sup>1/p</sup>''' It gives me the answers ascending up the scale rather than descending down. | '''((b-a)/b + 2<sup>p</sup> * a/b)<sup>1/p</sup>''' It gives me the answers ascending up the scale rather than descending down. | ||