Wedgie/Archived version: Difference between revisions

Jt alfa (talk | contribs)
This is just a test
Jt alfa (talk | contribs)
I computed a small example using exterior algebra. The main point is that these sort of computations can be easily done in Maple. Many basic algorithms are there, one doesn't really have to program anything oneself.
Line 104: Line 104:
=====Computing the previous example in Maple=====
=====Computing the previous example in Maple=====


In fact one can directly do many computations in Maple. Let us associate to the i'th prime the variable [math] x_i [/math]. So for example 7 corresponds to [math] x_4 [/math]. Then we introduce a basis vector [math] dx_i [/math] associated to the variable [math] x_i [/math]. Then to a pair of primes, for example [math] (3,7) [/math], we associate a basis vector [math] dx_2 \wedge dx_4 [/math]. Similarly if we have 3 or more primes.
In fact one can directly do many computations in Maple. Let us associate to the i'th prime the variable [math] x_i [/math]. So for example 7 corresponds to [math] x_4 [/math]. Then we introduce a basis vector [math] dx_i [/math] associated to the variable [math] x_i [/math]. Then to a pair of primes, for example [math] (3,7) [/math], we associate a basis vector [math] dx_2 \wedge dx_4 [/math]. Similarly if we have 3 or more primes. Expressions where there are [math] dx_i [/math] can be called 1 forms,  [math] dx_i \wedge dx_j [/math] 2 forms etc.


In this way let's write E19 = {{val| 19 30 44 53 }} and  E31 = {{val| 31 49 72 87 }}  as [math] e_{19}=19dx_1+30dx_2+44dx_3+53dx_4 [/math] and  [math] e_{31}=31dx_1+49dx_2+72dx_3+87dx_4 [/math].  Then we simply compute the exterior product
In this way let's write E19 = {{val| 19 30 44 53 }} and  E31 = {{val| 31 49 72 87 }}  as [math] e_{19}=19dx_1+30dx_2+44dx_3+53dx_4 [/math] and  [math] e_{31}=31dx_1+49dx_2+72dx_3+87dx_4 [/math].  Then we simply compute the exterior product


[math] \displaystyle e_{19}  \wedge e_{31}=dx_1\wedge dx_2+4dx_1\wedge dx_3+10dx_1\wedge dx_4+4dx_2\wedge dx_3 +13dx_2\wedge dx_4+12dx_3\wedge dx_4[/math].
[math] \displaystyle \alpha =e_{19}  \wedge e_{31}=dx_1\wedge dx_2+4dx_1\wedge dx_3+10dx_1\wedge dx_4+4dx_2\wedge dx_3 +13dx_2\wedge dx_4+12dx_3\wedge dx_4[/math].
 
A form is said to be decomposable if it can be written as an exterior product of 1 forms. So given above [math] \alpha [/math] how do we know if it is decomposable or not? Let us introduce a linear map [math] L (b)=b\wedge \alpha [/math]. This is a map from 1 forms to 3 forms. Now a kernel or nullspace of this map are all 1 forms such that [math] L(b)=0 [/math]. A basis for this nullspace in the present case is
 
[math] \displaystyle  b_1=dx_1-4dx_3-13dx_4 \quad, \quad b_2=dx_2+4dx_3+10dx_4 [/math].
 
Now one can check that [math] \alpha=b_1\wedge b_2 [/math]. All these computations can be done easily in Maple when the things are properly set up. But is this useful to anyone?


==Truncation of wedgies==
==Truncation of wedgies==