Talk:Frequency temperament: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 23:55, 31 March 2023 view source Cmloegcmluin (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,171 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 23:58, 31 March 2023 view source Cmloegcmluin (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,171 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:
	[[User:CompactStar\|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar\|talk]]) 02:08, 31 March 2023 (UTC)		[[User:CompactStar\|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar\|talk]]) 02:08, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

	: That's a fair point. To me, the comparison to temperaments seems tenuous here; this has nothing to do with commas and mappings, the linear algebra foundations of regular temperaments. It seems only to do with generators and possibly periods, which are another theoretical component that appears in RTT. A single "arithmetic interval chain", i.e. with a single generator, to me seems identical to an [[AFS]] (arithmetic frequency sequence), and any ideas you feel are present on this new page that you feel are missing from that page should be merged in. Otherwise, if your original idea is intended to be extending this idea to ''multiple'' generators, then it seems less like a single chain and more like a "lattice" or something like that. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 23:55, 31 March 2023 (UTC)		: That's a fair point. To me, the comparison to temperaments seems tenuous here; this has nothing to do with commas and mappings, the linear algebra foundations of regular temperaments. It seems only to do with generators and possibly periods, which are another theoretical component that appears in RTT. I understand that the page was already updated somewhat to improve upon this issue. A single "arithmetic interval chain", i.e. with a single generator, to me seems identical to an [[AFS]] (arithmetic frequency sequence), and any ideas you feel are present on this new page that you feel are missing from that page should be merged in. Otherwise, if your original idea is intended to be extending this idea to ''multiple'' generators, then it seems less like a single chain and more like a "lattice" or something like that. And as for "arithmetic MOS", I believe on the discussion page for that, I suggested "frequency MOS" as a more appropriate name. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 23:55, 31 March 2023 (UTC)