User talk:Cmloegcmluin/APS: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 18:28, 28 March 2023 view source Cmloegcmluin (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,160 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 18:29, 28 March 2023 view source Cmloegcmluin (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,160 edits →Periodicity and infiniteness? Newer edit →
Line 2:		Line 2:
	By "if not provided, the sequence is open-ended" it seems to suggest that systems in this category are finite and aperiodic when ''n'' is provided. By "''n''-EPD-''x'' = ''n''-APS-(''x''/''n'')" it seems to suggest that this tuning system is infinite and periodic just as equal multiplications. Which one is intended? [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 11:17, 4 March 2023 (UTC)		By "if not provided, the sequence is open-ended" it seems to suggest that systems in this category are finite and aperiodic when ''n'' is provided. By "''n''-EPD-''x'' = ''n''-APS-(''x''/''n'')" it seems to suggest that this tuning system is infinite and periodic just as equal multiplications. Which one is intended? [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 11:17, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

	: Great catch. The intention was that they are finite and aperiodic when ''n'' is provided. So they are only equivalent to a single period of a EPD. I have corrected accordingly. Thank you. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 18:28, 28 March 2023 (UTC)		: Great catch. The intention was that they are finite and aperiodic when ''n'' is provided. So they are only equivalent to a single period of a EPD. I have corrected accordingly (and the similar statements on the ALS and AFS pages). Thank you. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 18:28, 28 March 2023 (UTC)