Lumatone mapping for neutral thirds scales: Difference between revisions

Keenan Pepper (talk | contribs)
m fix up some sizes
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


=="Double-Bosanquet"==
=="Double-Bosanquet"==
This is called '''"Double-Bosanquet"''' since the diatonic scale is the same as in the [[Standard Lumatone mapping for Pythagorean|Bosanquet-Wilson layout]], except with rows of non-diatonic pitches inserted every other row. In other words it has exactly 2x as many pitches as Bosanquet, and if you removed all the half-sharps, half-flats etc. and slid the remaining rows together, it would become Bosanquet.
This is called '''"Double-Bosanquet"''' since the diatonic scale is the same as in the [[Standard Lumatone mapping for Pythagorean|Bosanquet–Wilson layout]], except with rows of non-diatonic pitches inserted every other row. In other words it has exactly 2x as many pitches as Bosanquet, and if you removed all the half-sharps, half-flats etc. and slid the remaining rows together, it would become Bosanquet.


{{Lumatone mapping|
{{Lumatone mapping|
Line 610: Line 610:
Pros:
Pros:
* Over 5 complete octaves.
* Over 5 complete octaves.
* Neutral seconds have good ergonomics, because they have the same shape that major seconds do in Bosanquet-Wilson.
* Neutral seconds have good ergonomics, because they have the same shape that major seconds do in Bosanquet–Wilson.


Cons:
Cons:
* Worse ergonomics for major seconds.
* May be unfamiliar or confusing to people familiar with normal Bosanquet.
* May be unfamiliar or confusing to people familiar with normal Bosanquet.
* In particular the "sharp" direction is now down toward the player (not up away from the player as in normal Bosanquet), which may be confusing.
* In particular the "sharp" direction is now down toward the player (not up away from the player as in normal Bosanquet), which may be confusing.


[[Category:Lumatone mappings]]
[[Category:Lumatone mappings]]