Talk:Tenney–Euclidean metrics: Difference between revisions
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) →simple badness / relative error: new section |
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) m ArrowHead294 moved page Talk:Tenney-Euclidean metrics to Talk:Tenney–Euclidean metrics |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
--[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 00:27, 28 April 2021 (UTC) | --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 00:27, 28 April 2021 (UTC) | ||
: It's TE simple badness aka relative error ''of a temperament''. It's not the relative error of a single interval. | |||
: It seems again, the TE temperament measures are about temperaments whereas TE metrics are about intervals. And I do agree the section on logflat badness should go to TE temperament measures page. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 07:53, 28 April 2021 (UTC) | |||
== logflat derivation == | |||
I'd like to have some derivation of the 'flatness' of logflat badness. After some research it seems to be related to what is known as simultaneous diophantine approximations. A theorem + proof for the rank-1 case can be found in "An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers" by Hardy and Wright, theorem 200 in the 4th edition. I have no idea how this works for higher rank, except that the formula seems like it should be mu = r/(d-r). | |||
In this [https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning-math/topicId_10079.html discussion on the tuning list] Gene said: | |||
: I discovered it via a convoluted derivation. It's simple enough that there is probably a way of looking at it which makes it obvious, but I havn't given the matter a lot of thought. | |||
: I started out from the vals, where I had something derived from the theory of multiple diophantine approximation. Then putting vals together led me to the exponent, which turned out to have a simple formula. I think I may have posted something on it which was fairly indigestible when that happened. | |||
Which doesn't really help. | |||
- [[User:Sintel|Sintel]] ([[User talk:Sintel|talk]]) 15:27, 25 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
: Good news, I found a derivation in Y. Bugeaud et al. "On transfer inequalities in Diophantine approximation, II", https://arxiv.org/abs/0811.2102 | |||
: I also request to unprotect this page. Just to clean up a bit, and move the logflat stuff to [[Tenney-Euclidean temperament measures]]. | |||
: - [[User:Sintel|Sintel]] ([[User talk:Sintel|talk]]) 12:49, 10 April 2022 (UTC) | |||
:: I can move the part in question, but protection is a policy, unfortunately. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 15:55, 11 April 2022 (UTC) | |||
::: I think it's best to talk to [[User:Mike Battaglia|Mike Battaglia]] about this. He protected the page without giving a reason (normally no page – besides main – of a wiki is protected). --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 06:25, 12 April 2022 (UTC) | |||
:::: Hopefully [https://www.facebook.com/groups/xenwiki/permalink/3046365965629387/ Mike's FB post] answers part of this (hopefully this link works too). [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 13:04, 12 April 2022 (UTC) |