23edf: Difference between revisions

Wikispaces>FREEZE
No edit summary
Fredg999 category edits (talk | contribs)
m Removing from Category:Edf using Cat-a-lot
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Twenty-three equal divisions of the perfect fifth (23ed3/2)
{{Infobox ET}}
'''23EDF''' is the [[EDF|equal division of the just perfect fifth]] into 23 parts of 30.5198 [[cents]] each, corresponding to 39.3188 [[edo]] (similar to every third step of [[118edo]]).


Rank 1 scale with step size of 30.52 cents.
==History==
A proponent of 23edf is [[Petr Pařízek]]. The first to write about 23edf on this wiki was [[Todd Harrop]] in 2015.


Close to 39ed2 and/or 62ed3, however, the respective
==Theory==
23edf is close to [[39edo]] and/or [[62edt]], however, the respective [[octave]] and [[tritave|twelfth]] would need to be nearly 10 cents flat.


octave and twelfth would need to be nearly 10 cents flat.
Some intervals in table below, selected on the basis of single-use of [[prime]]s (for most cases):
 
A proponent of this scale is Petr Pařízek.
 
Some intervals in table below, selected on the basis of
 
single-use of primes (for most cases):


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
Line 85: Line 82:
| style="text-align:center;" | 7/2
| style="text-align:center;" | 7/2
| style="text-align:center;" | –1.9¢
| style="text-align:center;" | –1.9¢
|}
=== Harmonics ===
{{Harmonics in equal|23|3|2}}
{{Harmonics in equal|23|3|2|start=12|collapsed=1}}
== Intervals ==
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible"
|+ Intervals of 23edf
|-
!Step number
!Size (cents)
|-
|1
|30.5198
|-
|2
|61.0296
|-
|3
|91.55935
|-
|4
|122.0791
|-
|5
|152.5989
|-
|6
|183.1187
|-
|7
|213.6385
|-
|8
|244.1583
|-
|9
|274.678
|-
|10
|305.1978
|-
|11
|335.7176
|-
|12
|366.2374
|-
|13
|396.7572
|-
|14
|427.277
|-
|15
|457.7967
|-
|16
|488.3165
|-
|17
|518.8363
|-
|18
|549.3561
|-
|19
|579.8759
|-
|20
|610.39565
|-
|21
|640.9154
|-
|22
|671.4352
|-
|23
|701.955
|-
|24
|732.4748
|-
|25
|762.9946
|-
|26
|793.51435
|-
|27
|824.0341
|-
|28
|854.5539
|-
|29
|885.0737
|-
|-
| style="text-align:center;" |  
|30
| style="text-align:center;" |  
|915.5935
| style="text-align:center;" |  
|-
| style="text-align:center;" |  
|31
|946.1133
|-
|32
|976.633
|-
|33
|1007.1529
|-
|34
|1037.6726
|-
|35
|1068.1924
|-
|36
|1098.7122
|-
|37
|1129.232
|-
|38
|1159.7517
|-
|39
|1190.2715
|-
|40
|1220.7913
|-
|41
|1251.3111
|-
|42
|1281.8309
|-
|43
|1312.35065
|-
|44
|1342.8704
|-
|45
|1373.3902
|-
|46
|1403.91
|}
|}
–Todd Harrop (June 2015)
{{todo|inline=1|complete table|text=Add at least one more column, showing what the notes are named, what JI they approximate, or anything else interesting about them individually.}}
[[Category:31edo]]
 
[[Category:edf]]
 
{{todo|expand}}
[[Category:nonoctave]]
[[Category:nonoctave]]
[[Category:what_is]]
[[Category:wiki]]