Talk:Ed7/3: Difference between revisions

(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)

Line 22:

– [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 00:36, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

: What about ed5/3? —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 09:27, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

:: Probably same story. Honestly I think we should be somewhat careful in applying [[XW:NG]] retroactively, but the part about:

:::Entries consisting solely of automatically generated content (e.g. interval tables, infoboxes) without context or explanation can be deleted without relocation.

:: Can be enforced without much issues, since we don't lose anything.

:: – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]])

::: I'm in support of deleting most of the ed5/3 and ed7/3 pages based on that guideline. I think this page itself should be considered under a different standard, and we'll have a clearer idea if we clean it up from MMTMisms (like "Middletown Valley" etc.).

::: Regards. -- [[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 20:43, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Using this thread for a wider discussion about the proliferation of various edX pages.

Another complaint by users is the pollution of search results for common edos.

For example, the search string "31ed" brings up:

: 31ed4

: 31ed5/2

: 31ed5/4

: 31ed6

: 31ed7/3

: 31ed7/4

: 31ed8

: 31edf

: 31edo

When presumably most users are looking for 31edo. Now, some of these might actually be useful, but surely not all of them.

– [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 13:39, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 00:36, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
+: What about ed5/3? —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 09:27, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
+:: Probably same story. Honestly I think we should be somewhat careful in applying [[XW:NG]] retroactively, but the part about:
+:::Entries consisting solely of automatically generated content (e.g. interval tables, infoboxes) without context or explanation can be deleted without relocation.
+:: Can be enforced without much issues, since we don't lose anything.
+:: – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]])
+::: I'm in support of deleting most of the ed5/3 and ed7/3 pages based on that guideline. I think this page itself should be considered under a different standard, and we'll have a clearer idea if we clean it up from MMTMisms (like "Middletown Valley" etc.).
+::: Regards. -- [[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 20:43, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
+Using this thread for a wider discussion about the proliferation of various edX pages.
+Another complaint by users is the pollution of search results for common edos.
+For example, the search string "31ed" brings up:
+: 31ed4
+: 31ed5/2
+: 31ed5/4
+: 31ed6
+: 31ed7/3
+: 31ed7/4
+: 31ed8
+: 31edf
+: 31edo
+When presumably most users are looking for 31edo. Now, some of these might actually be useful, but surely not all of them.
+– [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 13:39, 14 May 2026 (UTC)