Zhenlige (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Zhenlige (talk | contribs)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
I am more a theorist than a musician. My motivation of studying xen is acturally due to my interest in math.
I am more a theorist than a musician. My motivation of studying xen is acturally due to my interest in math.


When acturally work with xen music, I only use softwares, since I cannot play any instruments well — even 12edo ones. When working with different timbres, I feel that consonance and dissonance differs. Complex JI intervals (e.g. [[81/64]]) are more consonant than tempered sinple intervals (e.g. a meantone fifth) for synthetic waves (specifically, the parabolic wave, which is misnamed as “semisine” in ScaleWorkshop), but vise versa for real instrument samples.
When acturally work with xen music, I only use softwares, since I cannot play any instruments well — even 12edo ones. When working with different timbres, I feel that consonance and dissonance differs. Complex JI intervals (e.g. [[81/64]]) are more consonant than tempered simple intervals (e.g. a meantone fifth) for synthetic waves (specifically the semisine wave in Scale Workshop), but vise versa for real instrument samples.


[https://space.bilibili.com/281369461 Bilibili]
[https://space.bilibili.com/281369461 Bilibili]
== Personal terminology definitions ==
* Microtonal: music using finer-than-[[12edo]] tunings (non-12edo [[meantone]] tuning included)
* Xenharmonic: music that cannot be interpreted as [[5-limit]] [[12edo|12et]] without severe damage (12edo music using [[17/1|17]] or [[19/1|19]] included, most 5-limit [[meantone]] music excluded)


== Interval naming (thirds as an example) ==
== Interval naming (thirds as an example) ==