Talk:Bird's eye view of temperaments by accuracy: Difference between revisions
→Orwell: new section |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Orwell is a temperament that's definitely worth including here. However, should the 7- and 11-limits be included seperately, or should it just be put in the 11-limit section?--[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 23:45, 25 October 2025 (UTC) | Orwell is a temperament that's definitely worth including here. However, should the 7- and 11-limits be included seperately, or should it just be put in the 11-limit section?--[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 23:45, 25 October 2025 (UTC) | ||
== 2.3.7 Buzzard == | |||
It is placed into medium accuracy because "specifically, its interval of 7 barely violates the 4 ¢ bound". However, I think they only looked at 111edo tuning, and CTE and CWE give errors of 3.992{{c}} and 3.676{{c}} respectively, with [https://sintel.pythonanywhere.com/result?subgroup=2.3.7&reduce=on&weights=weil&target=9%2F7%2C+2%2F1&edos=&commas=65536%2F64827&submit_comma=submit 9-odd-limit minimax] being 3.424{{c}}. 13-limit buzzard ''should'' have 7/4 as a bound-violating interval, as [https://sintel.pythonanywhere.com/result?subgroup=13&reduce=on&weights=weil&target=2%2F1+15%2F14&edos=53%2C+58&submit_edo=submit&commas= 15-odd-limit minimax] is 4.091{{c}}. Still, 11/7 shouldn't be bound-violating, as seen by the [https://sintel.pythonanywhere.com/result?subgroup=13&reduce=on&weights=weil&target=2%2F1+121%2F48&edos=53%2C+58&submit_edo=submit&commas= 121/3 eigenmonzo tuning], which only has 7/4 violate the bound in the 15-odd-limit. In general, temperaments should be classified by the tunings that minimize the number of bound-violating intervals (possibly to zero), not ones supported by EDOs.--[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 16:24, 26 October 2025 (UTC) | |||