Template talk:Navbox Lumatone: Difference between revisions
Any support forthcoming for non-octave tunings? |
→Any support forthcoming for non-octave tunings?: Still not fixed |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Any support forthcoming for non-octave tunings? == | == Any support forthcoming for non-octave tunings? == | ||
If I try to use Navbox Lumatone for a mapping for a non-octave tuning, it thinks it is a mapping for an EDO and inserts it into the Lumatone mapping for ###edo series for navigation purposes. Any easy fix for this? So far have 3 pages currently affected (really should be 4, but Lumatone mapping for Bohlen-Pierce currently counts as a named tuning temperament page and not Lumatone mapping for 13edt, whereas it is actually both). [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 08:10, 23 October 2025 (UTC) | If I try to use Navbox Lumatone for a mapping for a non-octave tuning, it thinks it is a mapping for an EDO and inserts it into the Lumatone mapping for ###edo series for navigation purposes. Any easy fix for this? So far have 3 pages currently affected (really should be 4, but Lumatone mapping for Bohlen-Pierce currently counts as a named tuning temperament page and not Lumatone mapping for 13edt, whereas it is actually both). [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 08:10, 23 October 2025 (UTC) | ||
: Done. 08:28, 23 October 2025 (UTC) | |||
:: I tried it on Lumatone mapping for 8ed4/3, but it doesn't seem to work — the navigation box still thinks it is an edo (specifically 8edo), and it appears between Lumatone mapping for 7edo and Lumatone mapping for 8edo on the Category:Lumatone mappings page. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 08:43, 23 October 2025 (UTC) | |||