Talk:Fokker block: Difference between revisions
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
:: I don't see why they would be incorrect, you just get a constant structure with out-of-order steps but all the theoretical properties are intact. – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 11:10, 30 June 2025 (UTC) | :: I don't see why they would be incorrect, you just get a constant structure with out-of-order steps but all the theoretical properties are intact. – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 11:10, 30 June 2025 (UTC) | ||
::: Paragraph 2 currently says "a rank-2 Fokker block has max variety at most 2 (hence is a mos)", which would definitely have to be removed. The discrepancy in paragraph 3 is less egregious, although still not ideal. --[[User:Hkm|hkm]] ([[User talk:Hkm|talk]]) 21:29, 30 June 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::: But it is correct! You just get a MOS/constant structure with negative steps, which may be unintuitive or weird, but it's not wrong. E.g. [[glamma]] tempers via the [12 19 27 34] "epimorph", which maps 5/4 to 3 steps and 6/5 to 4 steps, so it's no wonder you get negative steps from it. – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 22:04, 30 June 2025 (UTC) | |||