User:Dummy index/Chromatic pairs and how we define haplotonic: Difference between revisions
Dummy index (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Dummy index (talk | contribs) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Proposal to simplify the definition = | |||
* In order to distinguish between the fixed category of [[:Category:Haplotonic scales]], etc., and the reciprocal relationship (haplotonic) + (albitonic) = (chromatic), the latter will be called, for example, MOS triplet. Every 3 successive generations of MOS that satisfies the above relationship will be called a MOS triplet. | |||
** Or moshaplotonic as a parent MOS, moschromatic as a descendant MOS, like that [[moschroma]] and [[mosdiesis]] are relative from any MOS scale of interest. | |||
* If the number of notes in the scale is important, consider using the [[Pentatonic]] and [[Heptatonic]] pages. | |||
* Based on the above equation and the nature of MOS, the chromatic must be a direct descendant of the albitonic. So I don't like the existence of mega-albitonic between albitonic and chromatic, even though the meanings of relational and categorical usages don't have to be exactly the same. (I will also withdraw the mini-albitonic that I said.) | |||
* Categorical haplotonic scales include the last MOS that s ≥ 125 ¢ and some subset of such scales. in <nowiki>[[Chromatic pairs]]</nowiki>, such subsets all may be labelled mini-haplotonic (even if there are more than one). | |||
* Categorical albitonic scale is the first MOS that s < 125 ¢. | |||
** If the interval that appears is too narrow to be a semitone, it may be a [[Cluster MOS]]. | |||
* Categorical chromatic scales include direct descendant of albitonic (by adding corresponding haplotonic) and further descendant <del>(by adding same haplotonic)</del>. in <nowiki>[[Chromatic pairs]]</nowiki>, such further descendants all may be labelled mega-chromatic (even if there are more than one). | |||
= Memos = | |||
I couldn't find a comprehensive explanation of haplotonic, so I'm going to consider the current situation in my own way. | I couldn't find a comprehensive explanation of haplotonic, so I'm going to consider the current situation in my own way. | ||
| Line 25: | Line 35: | ||
* Seni[5] and Sensi[8] both are labelled Category:Haplotonic scales. Only Sensi[8] is strong haplotonic, but Sensi[5] is shorter genchain, obviously more haplo than Sensi[8]. both haplotonic? mini-haplotonic and haplotonic? haplotonic and strong-haplotonic? Well, shouldn't both be haplotonic? Isn't it just that we want to differentiate it because we're trying to include it in the scale-list? | * Seni[5] and Sensi[8] both are labelled Category:Haplotonic scales. Only Sensi[8] is strong haplotonic, but Sensi[5] is shorter genchain, obviously more haplo than Sensi[8]. both haplotonic? mini-haplotonic and haplotonic? haplotonic and strong-haplotonic? Well, shouldn't both be haplotonic? Isn't it just that we want to differentiate it because we're trying to include it in the scale-list? | ||
** If there are multiple haplotonic scale in condition 1 and 3, it may be nice to name most-notes scale (must be strong haplotonic!) "strong haplotonic" or "maximum haplotonic" or "the end of haplotonic". | ** If there are multiple haplotonic scale in condition 1 and 3, it may be nice to name most-notes scale (must be strong haplotonic!) "strong haplotonic" or "maximum haplotonic" or "the end of haplotonic". | ||
*** Baldy[5] and Baldy[6] both are strong haplotonic, so we need to use different terms to distinguish them. | *** Baldy[5] and Baldy[6] both are strong haplotonic, so we need to use different terms to distinguish them. e.g. Baldy4/5/6 are haplotonic and Baldy6 is max-haplotonic. Until Baldy5 become listed, Baldy6 is simply called haplotonic. | ||
* Fractional-octave? | * Fractional-octave? | ||
* Are they undoubtedly haplotonic? neutral third 3L 4s, mavila 2L 5s, ... | |||