Talk:MODMOS scale: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
Update |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:: Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this, it is a big help :) | :: Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this, it is a big help :) | ||
The MODMOS article as it stands right now reads "''although numerous options exist for the choice of chromatic alteration, the standard is alteration by the MOS's chroma''", which means that as it stands right now, those infinite options are already available, and they are included within MODMOS. | :: The MODMOS article as it stands right now reads "''although numerous options exist for the choice of chromatic alteration, the standard is alteration by the MOS's chroma''", which means that as it stands right now, those infinite options are already available, and they are included within MODMOS. | ||
:: So the problem already exists. | :: So the problem already exists. | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
:: I like the term inflected MOS. Should we have an abbreviation like IMOS or INFMOS, or should we just call it inflected MOS with no abbreviation? I'm happy either way. | :: I like the term inflected MOS. Should we have an abbreviation like IMOS or INFMOS, or should we just call it inflected MOS with no abbreviation? I'm happy either way. | ||
:: --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 04:16, 12 January 2024 (UTC) | :: --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 04:16, 12 January 2024 (UTC) | ||
:: I have created the page now. I decided to go with inflected MOS as the name. Thank you for the name :) | |||
:: --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 06:15, 14 January 2024 (UTC) | |||