Talk:Optimal patent val: Difference between revisions
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) |
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Separately I am proposing "simple" as an alternative for "patent", so even better would be "optimal simply-mapped EDO", if you agree with the reasons for simple over patent. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 22:41, 28 June 2021 (UTC) | Separately I am proposing "simple" as an alternative for "patent", so even better would be "optimal simply-mapped EDO", if you agree with the reasons for simple over patent. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 22:41, 28 June 2021 (UTC) | ||
: From what I know the OPV ''is'' a val. Using edo here is incorrect and may be only for the reason of convenient linking. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 02:48, 29 June 2021 (UTC) | |||
:: Okay. I'll assume you're correct that the core item of interest here is truly a val and therefore that the use of EDOs in the tables is incorrect, and I've corrected that (at least I put a bandage over it, replacing "Optimal patent val" in the "header" with "ET w/ optimal patent val", and changing link text from EDO to ET for consistency). --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 18:29, 30 September 2021 (UTC) | |||