Talk:Familiar melodies in unfamiliar tunings: Difference between revisions
WikispacesArchive>Mike Battaglia m Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' <span style="color:#800000">''... |
→Bohlen-Pierce: new section |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WSArchiveLink}} | {{WSArchiveLink}} | ||
== 19-edo == | |||
I'd argue that 99.9% of all mainstream music can be adapted into 19-edo without any effort whatsoever. The article mentions only 31-edo, but really 31-edo is to 19-edo as 19-edo is to 12-edo. | |||
That said, I'm not even sure if pieces adapted into 19-edo even vaguely qualify as xenharmonic, although, the same ought to apply to "standard" pieces faithfully adapted into 31-edo, for the same reasons. | |||
I have a fairly extensive collection of recordings of other people's music I recorded in 19-edo, going back decades - none of it particularly good nor interesting, in my opinion. | |||
--[[User:Bozu|Bozu]] ([[User talk:Bozu|talk]]) 19:51, 27 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Bohlen-Pierce == | |||
I'd love to hear what something like Bouree would sound like in BP! I can imagine it'd be a heck of a lot of effort to make any sense of something with counterpoint in a system without octaves, though. | |||