User talk:Hkm: Difference between revisions

Line 1:

I don't like this being a red link so I'm just putting some unimportant text here

== 89edo-92edo tempering out the quartisma ==

Originally, the [[89edo]], [[90edo]], [[91edo]], and [[92edo]] articles all mentioned being in a series of four consecutive edos tempering out the [[quartisma]]. I see you've removed it from 90edo recently, and 89edo a while back. When I checked the history, I found that this information was added to these pages by [[User:Aura|Aura]] back in September of 2020.

In my opinion, Aura does seem to have some bias towards its notability, likely since 33/32 is an important interval in [[Alpharabian tuning]]. Nonetheless, if you removed it from the 89edo and 90edo pages, it would be best to remove it from the 91edo and 92edo pages as well. --[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 17:08, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 I don't like this being a red link so I'm just putting some unimportant text here
+== 89edo-92edo tempering out the quartisma ==
+Originally, the [[89edo]], [[90edo]], [[91edo]], and [[92edo]] articles all mentioned being in a series of four consecutive edos tempering out the [[quartisma]]. I see you've removed it from 90edo recently, and 89edo a while back. When I checked the history, I found that this information was added to these pages by [[User:Aura|Aura]] back in September of 2020.
+In my opinion, Aura does seem to have some bias towards its notability, likely since 33/32 is an important interval in [[Alpharabian tuning]]. Nonetheless, if you removed it from the 89edo and 90edo pages, it would be best to remove it from the 91edo and 92edo pages as well. --[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 17:08, 20 March 2026 (UTC)