Talk:16edo: Difference between revisions

(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)

Line 2:

== 7mus ==

Any good reason for 7mus to be included in the table?

- [[User:Sintel|Sintel]] ([[User talk:Sintel|talk]]) 16:18, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

== Assumption of tuning theory ==

*Why* exactly is tuning theory assumed? This is the problem that Domin was complaining about, that people talk too much about tuning specificities and less about composition theory. I want to make steps towards fixing that by not considering "tuning theory" the default form of theory. -- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 02:10, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

: The theory section should just give a general overview of the structure, which is what it does. If you think the section needs to be less formal then try to improve it instead of giving it a different title.

: Sidenote: "composition theory" is not really a thing, better call it "practical approaches" or something. – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 11:41, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

== FloraC edits ==

Stop deleting people's work on pages without discussing it first. I thought we made this clear around when I previously left the server (April 2025). I at least made sure to preserve all the information in my rewrite. -- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 16:43, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

== Subgroups for the interval table ==

Actually, would it be fairer to consider it a 7-limit temp first? —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 05:19, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

: I just used 2.3.5.11 because of mavila. A single 13-limit column wouldn't be the best, as 16edo is quite small so the table will be cluttered, plus it isn't very accurate. Splitting it into the 7-limit and 13-limit seems like a good idea.--[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 05:33, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 == 7mus ==
 Any good reason for 7mus to be included in the table?
 - [[User:Sintel|Sintel]] ([[User talk:Sintel|talk]]) 16:18, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
+== Assumption of tuning theory ==
+*Why* exactly is tuning theory assumed? This is the problem that Domin was complaining about, that people talk too much about tuning specificities and less about composition theory. I want to make steps towards fixing that by not considering "tuning theory" the default form of theory. -- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 02:10, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
+: The theory section should just give a general overview of the structure, which is what it does. If you think the section needs to be less formal then try to improve it instead of giving it a different title.
+: Sidenote: "composition theory" is not really a thing, better call it "practical approaches" or something. – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 11:41, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
+== FloraC edits ==
+Stop deleting people's work on pages without discussing it first. I thought we made this clear around when I previously left the server (April 2025). I at least made sure to preserve all the information in my rewrite. -- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 16:43, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
+== Subgroups for the interval table ==
+Actually, would it be fairer to consider it a 7-limit temp first? —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 05:19, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
+: I just used 2.3.5.11 because of mavila. A single 13-limit column wouldn't be the best, as 16edo is quite small so the table will be cluttered, plus it isn't very accurate. Splitting it into the 7-limit and 13-limit seems like a good idea.--[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 05:33, 25 February 2026 (UTC)