User:Pailiaq/Tritone substitution: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
* The leading tone resolves by a smaller step (~50¢) to the tonic—a tighter, more chromatic pull | * The leading tone resolves by a smaller step (~50¢) to the tonic—a tighter, more chromatic pull | ||
* The | * The fourth now sits ~550¢ above the tonic, requiring a ~150¢ descent to reach the mediant at 400¢ | ||
* The small leading tone at extremes starts to feel weaker, becoming more like a comma adjustment of the tonic rather than a melodic step | * The small leading tone at extremes starts to feel weaker, becoming more like a comma adjustment of the tonic rather than a melodic step | ||
| Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
* The leading tone resolves by ~150¢—a wider, more whole-tone-like motion | * The leading tone resolves by ~150¢—a wider, more whole-tone-like motion | ||
* The | * The fourth tone at ~450¢ resolves down by ~50¢ to the 400c major third, though may also voicelead more smoothly to the neutral or minor third, letting you target different tonic chords besides major different major | ||
* The upward resolution feels less urgent | * The upward resolution feels less urgent | ||
This balancing act means that dominant function in xenharmonic systems can take on different characters depending on where the leading tone sits. | This balancing act means that dominant function in xenharmonic systems can take on different characters depending on where the leading tone sits. If using a wider tritone, like 630c, with the leading tone at 1050c, the fourth tone will then be located at 420c, which will lead very cleanly to a minor or neutral chord. So tritone size as well as its position in the leading tone interval region gives it different properties. | ||
==Summary== | ==Summary== | ||