Ed8/3: Difference between revisions

BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
m Improved layout, removed informal language
Fredg999 category edits (talk | contribs)
m Removing from Category:Edonoi using Cat-a-lot
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


== Equivalence ==
== Equivalence ==
Division of 8/3 into equal parts does not necessarily imply directly using this interval as an [[equivalence]]. Many, though not all, ed8/3 scales have a perceptually important [[Pseudo-octave|false octave]], with various degrees of accuracy.


Division of 8/3 into equal parts does not necessarily imply directly using this interval as an [[equivalence]]. The question of equivalence has not even been posed yet. Many, though not all, of these scales have a false [[octave]], with various degrees of accuracy. The eleventh is also the highest equivalence where composers do not need to go beyond the false octave just to have a reasonably complete chordal harmony. However, the utility of 8/3 or another eleventh as a base is complicated by the fact that 8/3 is the avoid note in a major modality although this matters less in Mixolydian than it does in Ionian given that the former is the natural dominant scale anyway.
The eleventh is the highest [[period]] where composers do not need to go beyond the false octave just to have a reasonably complete chordal harmony. The structural utility of 8/3 or another eleventh as a period may be undermined, though, by the fact that 8/3 is the {{w|avoid note}} in a major modality. This matters less in Mixolydian than it does in Ionian given that the former is the natural dominant scale anyway.


Incidentally, one way to treat 8/3 as an equivalence is the use of the 3:4:5:6:(8) chord as the fundamental complete sonority in a very similar way to the 4:5:6:(8) chord in [[meantone]].  
One approach to ed8/3 tunings is the use of the 3:4:5:6:(8) chord as the fundamental complete sonority in a very similar way to the 4:5:6:(8) chord in [[meantone]].


== Regular temperament approaches ==
== Joseph Ruhf's approach ==
Whereas in meantone it takes four [[3/2]] to get to [[5/1]], here it takes twelve octaves to get to [[134217718/98415]] (tempering out the schisma). So, doing this yields 7-, 10- and 17- or 13-, 16- or 19-note [[mos scale]]s. While the notes are rather farther apart, the scheme is uncannily similar to the [[mohajira]] (within 8/3) temperaments. [[Joseph Ruhf]] calls this the "Macromohajira" Bolivarian mode.
{{idiosyncratic terms}}
Whereas in meantone it takes four [[3/2]] to get to [[5/1]], here it takes twelve octaves to get to [[134217718/98415]] (tempering out the schisma). So, doing this yields 7-, 10- and 17- or 13-, 16- or 19-note [[mos scale]]s. While the notes are rather farther apart, the scheme is uncannily similar to the [[mohajira]] (within 8/3) temperaments. [[Joseph Ruhf]] calls this the ''Macromohajira Bolivarian mode''.


=== Temperament areas ===
=== Temperament areas ===
Line 24: Line 26:
* Perfect Ionian through Pluperfect/Abundant Phrygian[9i]: Montréal
* Perfect Ionian through Pluperfect/Abundant Phrygian[9i]: Montréal


[[Category:Ed8/3| ]] <!-- main article -->
[[Category:Ed8/3's| ]]
[[Category:Edonoi]]
<!-- main article -->
[[Category:Lists of scales]]
[[Category:Lists of scales]]
{{Todo| review }}
 
 
{{todo|inline=1|cleanup|explain edonoi|text=Most people do not think 8/3 sounds like an equivalence, so there must be some other reason why people are dividing it — some property ''other than'' equivalence that makes people want to divide it. Please add to this page an explanation of what that reason is... The page also needs a general overall cleanup.}}