204ed96: Difference between revisions

(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 1:

== Theory ==

The 96th harmonic ~~would~~ be ~~extremely wide for an~~ equivalence, so 204ed96 is better thought of as a stretched version of [[31edo]]. Indeed, tuning the 96/1 ratio just instead of 2/1 results in octaves being [[stretched and compressed tuning|stretched]] by about 0.79{{c}}. The local [[The Riemann zeta function and tuning #Optimal octave stretch|zeta peak]] around 31 is located at 30.978382, which has a step size of 38.737{{c}} and an octave of 1200.837{{c}} (which is stretched by 0.837{{c}}), making 204ed96 extremely close to optimal for 31edo.

The 96th harmonic is far too wide to be a useful equivalence, so 204ed96 is better thought of as a stretched version of [[31edo]]. Indeed, tuning the 96/1 ratio just instead of 2/1 results in octaves being [[stretched and compressed tuning|stretched]] by about 0.79{{c}}. The local [[The Riemann zeta function and tuning #Optimal octave stretch|zeta peak]] around 31 is located at 30.978382, which has a step size of 38.737{{c}} and an octave of 1200.837{{c}} (which is stretched by 0.837{{c}}), making 204ed96 extremely close to optimal for 31edo.

=== Harmonics ===

Line 10:

{{Harmonics in equal|204|96|1|intervals=integer|columns=12|start=12|collapsed=true|title=Approximation of harmonics in 204ed96 (continued)}}

~~== See also ==~~

* [[18edf]] – relative edf

* [[31edo]] – relative edo

Line 16:

Line 15:

* [[72ed5]] – relative ed5

* [[80ed6]] – relative ed6

* [[87ed7]] – relative ed7

* [[107ed11]] – relative ed11

* [[111ed12]] – relative ed12

* [[138ed22]] – relative ed22

* [[39cET]]

[[Category:31edo]]

[[Category:Zeta-optimized tunings]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{mathematical interest}}
+{{Mathematical interest}}
 {{Infobox ET}}
 {{ED intro}}
 == Theory ==
-The 96th harmonic would be extremely wide for an equivalence, so 204ed96 is better thought of as a stretched version of [[31edo]]. Indeed, tuning the 96/1 ratio just instead of 2/1 results in octaves being [[stretched and compressed tuning|stretched]] by about 0.79{{c}}. The local [[The Riemann zeta function and tuning #Optimal octave stretch|zeta peak]] around 31 is located at 30.978382, which has a step size of 38.737{{c}} and an octave of 1200.837{{c}} (which is stretched by 0.837{{c}}), making 204ed96 extremely close to optimal for 31edo.
+The 96th harmonic is far too wide to be a useful equivalence, so 204ed96 is better thought of as a stretched version of [[31edo]]. Indeed, tuning the 96/1 ratio just instead of 2/1 results in octaves being [[stretched and compressed tuning|stretched]] by about 0.79{{c}}. The local [[The Riemann zeta function and tuning #Optimal octave stretch|zeta peak]] around 31 is located at 30.978382, which has a step size of 38.737{{c}} and an octave of 1200.837{{c}} (which is stretched by 0.837{{c}}), making 204ed96 extremely close to optimal for 31edo.
 === Harmonics ===
@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 {{Harmonics in equal|204|96|1|intervals=integer|columns=12|start=12|collapsed=true|title=Approximation of harmonics in 204ed96 (continued)}}
-== See also ==
 * [[18edf]] – relative edf
 * [[31edo]] – relative edo
@@ Line 16: / Line 15: @@
 * [[72ed5]] – relative ed5
 * [[80ed6]] – relative ed6
+* [[87ed7]] – relative ed7
+* [[107ed11]] – relative ed11
 * [[111ed12]] – relative ed12
+* [[138ed22]] – relative ed22
+* [[39cET]]
 [[Category:31edo]]
 [[Category:Zeta-optimized tunings]]