Talk:Helmholtz–Ellis notation: Difference between revisions
m Priority (more monthly Google clicks than zeta; most of any notation page) |
→31-limit schisma and 41-limit comma symbols: new section |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Latest revision says "[[File:Heji41.svg|54x54px]] is ''n'' a half-sharp, as [[File:Heji41.svg|54x54px]][[File:Heji41.svg|54x54px]]F is [[243/242|7.1¢]] flatter than F♯." (used to have ''not'' instead of ''n''). Is this a typo/copy-paste error? [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 20:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC) | Latest revision says "[[File:Heji41.svg|54x54px]] is ''n'' a half-sharp, as [[File:Heji41.svg|54x54px]][[File:Heji41.svg|54x54px]]F is [[243/242|7.1¢]] flatter than F♯." (used to have ''not'' instead of ''n''). Is this a typo/copy-paste error? [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 20:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
: FloraC fixed it in revision of 2024-11-21T04:39:55. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 11:10, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | : FloraC fixed it in revision of 2024-11-21T04:39:55. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 11:10, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
== 31-limit schisma and 41-limit comma symbols == | |||
I don't know if you can do anything about it (if it's the standard, it's the standard), but the symbols for up/down by 31-limit schisma look extremely similar to the symbols for up/down by 41-limit comma. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 07:30, 12 July 2025 (UTC) | |||