540edo: Difference between revisions

Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
I've asked for the clutter of pages of different forms for the words defactor and enfactor to be deleted, so now pages that linked to them need to be updated to use the remaining working link
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''540 equal divisions of the octave''' ('''540edo'''), or the '''540(-tone) equal temperament''' ('''540tet''', '''540et'''), divides the [[octave]] in 540 [[equal]] steps of about 2.22 [[cent]]s each.
{{Infobox ET}}
{{ED intro}}


== Theory ==
== Theory ==
Since 540 = 2 × 270 and 540 = 45 × 12, it contains [[270edo]] and [[12edo]] as subsets, both belonging to [[The Riemann Zeta Function and Tuning #Zeta EDO lists|the ''zeta peak edos'', ''zeta integral edos'' and ''zeta gap edos'' sequences]]. It is [[enfactoring|enfactored]] in the 13-limit, with the same tuning as 270edo, but it makes for a reasonable 17- and 19-limit system, and perhaps beyond. It is, however, no longer [[consistent]] in the [[15-odd-limit]], all because of [[15/13]] being 1.14 cents sharp of just.  
Since {{nowrap|540 {{=}} 2 × 270}} and {{nowrap|540 {{=}} 45 × 12}}, 540edo contains [[270edo]] and [[12edo]] as subsets, both being important [[zeta edo]]s. It is [[enfactoring|enfactored]] in the 13-limit, with the same tuning as 270edo, but it makes for a reasonable 17-, 19- and 23-limit system, and beyond. It is, however, no longer [[consistent]] in the [[15-odd-limit]], all because of [[15/13]] being 1.14 cents sharp of just.
 
The equal temperament [[tempering out|tempers out]] [[1156/1155]] and [[2601/2600]] in the 17-limit; [[1216/1215]], [[1331/1330]], [[1445/1444]] and [[1729/1728]] in the 19-limit; [[1105/1104]] and [[1496/1495]] in the 23-limit. Although it does quite well in these limits, it is not as ''efficient'' as 270edo's original mappings, as it has greater relative errors (→ [[#Regular temperament properties]]). It is therefore a question of whether one thinks these tuning improvements and differently supplied [[essentially tempered chord]]s are worth the load of all the extra notes.
 
The approximated [[29/1|29]] and [[31/1|31]] are relatively weak, but [[37/1|37]], [[41/1|41]] and [[43/1|43]] are quite spot on, with the 43 coming from 270edo. For this reason, we may consider it as a full [[43-limit]] system. For all the primes starting with 29, it removes the distinction of otonal and utonal [[superparticular ratio|superparticular]] pairs (e.g. 29/28 vs 30/29 for prime 29) by tempering out the corresponding [[square superparticular]]s, which is responsible for its slightly flat-tending tuning profile. Prime [[47/1|47]] does not have that privilege and falls practically halfway between, though the sharp mapping might be preferred to keep [[47/46]] wider than [[48/47]]. As a compensation, you do get a spot-on prime [[53/1|53]] for free.  


=== Prime harmonics ===
=== Prime harmonics ===
{{Primes in edo|540|columns=11}}
{{Harmonics in equal|540|columns=12}}
{{Harmonics in equal|540|columns=12|start=13|collapsed=true|title=Approximation of prime harmonics in 540edo (continued)}}
 
=== Subsets and supersets ===
540 is a very composite number. The [[prime factorization]] of 540 is {{factorization|540}}. Its nontrivial divisors are {{EDOs| 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 12, 15, 18, 20, 27, 30, 36, 45, 54, 60, 90, 108, 135, 180, and 270 }}.
 
A step of 540edo is known as a '''dexl''', proposed by [[Joseph Monzo]] in April 2023 as an [[interval size measure]]<ref>[http://tonalsoft.com/enc/d/dexl.aspx Tonalsoft Encyclopedia | Dexl / 540edo]</ref>.
 
== Approximation to JI ==
{{Q-odd-limit intervals|540|23}}


=== Divisors ===
== Regular temperament properties ==
540 is a very composite number. The prime factorization of 540 is 2<sup>2</sup> × 3<sup>3</sup> × 5. Its divisors are 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 12, 15, 18, 20, 27, 30, 36, 45, 54, 60, 90, 108, 135, 180, and 270.
{| class="wikitable center-4 center-5 center-6"
! rowspan="2" | [[Subgroup]]
! rowspan="2" | [[Comma list|Comma List]]
! rowspan="2" | [[Mapping]]
! rowspan="2" | Optimal<br>8ve Stretch (¢)
! colspan="2" | Tuning Error
|-
! [[TE error|Absolute]] (¢)
! [[TE simple badness|Relative]] (%)
|-
| 2.3.5.7.11.13.17
| 676/675, 1001/1000, 1156/1155, 1716/1715, 3025/3024, 4096/4095
| {{mapping| 540 856 1254 1516 1868 1998 2207 }}
| -0.0022
| 0.1144
| 5.15
|-
| 2.3.5.7.11.13.17.19
| 676/675, 1001/1000, 1156/1155, 1216/1215, 1331/1330, 1445/1444, 1729/1728
| {{mapping| 540 856 1254 1516 1868 1998 2207 2294 }}
| -0.0098
| 0.1088
| 4.90
|-
| 2.3.5.7.11.13.17.19.23
| 676/675, 1001/1000, 1105/1104, 1156/1155, 1216/1215, 1331/1330, 1445/1444, 1496/1495
| {{mapping| 540 856 1254 1516 1868 1998 2207 2294 2443 }}
| -0.024
| 0.1100
| 4.95
|}


[[Category:Equal divisions of the octave]]
== Notes ==