Xenharmonic Wiki:Referendum: Difference between revisions
Announced final results |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 174: | Line 174: | ||
* A. I agree largely with Sintel's reasoning above. [[User:Unque|Unque]] ([[User talk:Unque|talk]]) 14:42, 11 February 2025 (UTC) | * A. I agree largely with Sintel's reasoning above. [[User:Unque|Unque]] ([[User talk:Unque|talk]]) 14:42, 11 February 2025 (UTC) | ||
* The options I'm okay with are A. [[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 16:17, 11 February 2025 (UTC) | * The options I'm okay with are A. [[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 16:17, 11 February 2025 (UTC) | ||
* I'm good with A or B. Also F: Create a page category tag thingy to say "This is a legacy page, because its primary author is deceased. Use the discussion tab to suggest changes." In other words, I'm proposing B but without any formal process or deadline on what we do in response. [[User:Xenjacob|Xenjacob]] ([[User talk:Xenjacob|talk]]) 03:18, 19 February 2025 (UTC) | |||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
| Line 205: | Line 206: | ||
* A; I again agree with Sintel's comment. [[User:Unque|Unque]] ([[User talk:Unque|talk]]) 14:42, 11 February 2025 (UTC) | * A; I again agree with Sintel's comment. [[User:Unque|Unque]] ([[User talk:Unque|talk]]) 14:42, 11 February 2025 (UTC) | ||
* The options I'm okay with are A. [[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 16:17, 11 February 2025 (UTC) | * The options I'm okay with are A. [[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 16:17, 11 February 2025 (UTC) | ||
* The options I'm okay with are A. Additionally I recommend looking into the feasibility of adding a checkbox when editing, like "minor edit" but, "mathematical correction". [[User:Xenjacob|Xenjacob]] ([[User talk:Xenjacob|talk]]) 03:23, 19 February 2025 (UTC) | |||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
| Line 265: | Line 267: | ||
* D. A page is created where anyone can nominate a page to be locked or unlocked. A yes/no vote is then held using the same rules as the yes/no votes on this page, except that ONLY admins can vote. The admins must enforce the results of the vote. | * D. A page is created where anyone can nominate a page to be locked or unlocked. A yes/no vote is then held using the same rules as the yes/no votes on this page, except that ONLY admins can vote. The admins must enforce the results of the vote. | ||
* E. Any proposed lock or unlock must be first suggested in both a Discord poll in #wiki, and a Facebook poll in Xenwiki Work Group. It must recieve more yes votes than no votes on BOTH platforms, as of exactly 7 days after the poll is posted. If nobody votes at all on one of the platforms, that is considered a "yes" vote. The admins must enforce the results of the vote. | * E. Any proposed lock or unlock must be first suggested in both a Discord poll in #wiki, and a Facebook poll in Xenwiki Work Group. It must recieve more yes votes than no votes on BOTH platforms, as of exactly 7 days after the poll is posted. If nobody votes at all on one of the platforms, that is considered a "yes" vote. The admins must enforce the results of the vote. | ||
* F. None of these options are acceptable, the community should be asked to invent a different option which can then be voted on. | * F. There should be a clear protection policy (analogous to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Protection_policy Wikipedia's protection policy]). | ||
* G. None of these options are acceptable, the community should be asked to invent a different option which can then be voted on. | |||
; Votes | ; Votes | ||
| Line 276: | Line 279: | ||
: Protection should be used sparingly and mostly as a last resort. Leaving pages protected indefinitely without leaving any path to unprotect them (as is happening now!) is unacceptable on a wiki. [[User:Sintel|Sintel]] ([[User talk:Sintel|talk]]) 13:09, 9 February 2025 (UTC) | : Protection should be used sparingly and mostly as a last resort. Leaving pages protected indefinitely without leaving any path to unprotect them (as is happening now!) is unacceptable on a wiki. [[User:Sintel|Sintel]] ([[User talk:Sintel|talk]]) 13:09, 9 February 2025 (UTC) | ||
* The options I'm okay with are F. [[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 13:17, 9 February 2025 (UTC) | * The options I'm okay with are F. [[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 13:17, 9 February 2025 (UTC) | ||
* The options I'm okay with are F. (just added Sintel's to the list at top) [[User:Xenjacob|Xenjacob]] ([[User talk:Xenjacob|talk]]) 03:26, 19 February 2025 (UTC) | |||
* The options I'm okay with are F. [[User:Francium|Francium]] ([[User talk:Francium|talk]]) 13:26, 9 February 2025 (UTC) | * The options I'm okay with are F. [[User:Francium|Francium]] ([[User talk:Francium|talk]]) 13:26, 9 February 2025 (UTC) | ||
* The options I'm okay with are F. See Sintel's comment above. [[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 15:11, 9 February 2025 (UTC) | * The options I'm okay with are F. See Sintel's comment above. [[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 15:11, 9 February 2025 (UTC) | ||
| Line 291: | Line 295: | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
== Final results == | == Final results == | ||
=== Question 1 === | === Question 1 === | ||
Yes, FloraC will be granted | Yes, FloraC will be granted bureaucrat permissions. (100% of 18 votes). | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||