Xenharmonic Wiki:Referendum: Difference between revisions

ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs)
Xenjacob (talk | contribs)
 
(30 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 42: Line 42:
* YES. [[User:Eli5121|Eli5121]] ([[User talk:Eli5121|talk]]) 15:28, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:Eli5121|Eli5121]] ([[User talk:Eli5121|talk]]) 15:28, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:ArrowHead294|<math>\overrightarrow{\,\,\scriptsize\text{ArrowHead294}\,\,\,}</math>]] [[User talk:ArrowHead294|(speak to me)]] 15:53, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:ArrowHead294|<math>\overrightarrow{\,\,\scriptsize\text{ArrowHead294}\,\,\,}</math>]] [[User talk:ArrowHead294|(speak to me)]] 15:53, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:CellularAutomaton|CellularAutomaton]] ([[User talk:CellularAutomaton|talk]]) 18:56, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 22:29, 9 February 2025 (UTC)"
* YES. [[User:VIxen|VIxen]] ([[User talk:VIxen|talk]]) 03:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:2^67-1|2^67-1]] ([[User talk:2^67-1|talk]]) 04:27, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 04:40, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:DotuXil|DotuXil]] <span style="color:#f50c7d">(i like microtones)</span> 05:40, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:Unque|Unque]] ([[User talk:Unque|talk]]) 14:42, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:Recentlymaterialized|recentlymaterialized]] ([[User_talk:Recentlymaterialized|talk]]) 21:00, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
<br><br>
<br><br>


=== Question 2. Should Fredg999 be granted sysop permissions? YES or NO? ===
=== Question 2. Should Fredg999 be granted sysop permissions? YES or NO? ===
Line 54: Line 63:
* YES. [[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 15:11, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 15:11, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:Eli5121|Eli5121]] ([[User talk:Eli5121|talk]]) 15:28, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:Eli5121|Eli5121]] ([[User talk:Eli5121|talk]]) 15:28, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:CellularAutomaton|CellularAutomaton]] ([[User talk:CellularAutomaton|talk]]) 18:56, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 19:11, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 22:30, 9 February 2025 (UTC)"
* YES. [[User:VIxen|VIxen]] ([[User talk:VIxen|talk]]) 03:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:2^67-1|2^67-1]] ([[User talk:2^67-1|talk]]) 04:27, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 04:40, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:DotuXil|DotuXil]] <span style="color:#f50c7d">(i like microtones)</span> 05:40, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:Unque|Unque]] ([[User talk:Unque|talk]]) 14:42, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:Recentlymaterialized|recentlymaterialized]] ([[User_talk:Recentlymaterialized|talk]]) 21:00, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
<br><br>
<br><br>


Line 66: Line 84:
* YES. [[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 15:11, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 15:11, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:Eli5121|Eli5121]] ([[User talk:Eli5121|talk]]) 15:28, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:Eli5121|Eli5121]] ([[User talk:Eli5121|talk]]) 15:28, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:CellularAutomaton|CellularAutomaton]] ([[User talk:CellularAutomaton|talk]]) 18:56, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 19:11, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 22:30, 9 February 2025 (UTC)"
* YES. [[User:VIxen|VIxen]] ([[User talk:VIxen|talk]]) 03:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:2^67-1|2^67-1]] ([[User talk:2^67-1|talk]]) 04:27, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 04:40, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:DotuXil|DotuXil]] <span style="color:#f50c7d">(i like microtones)</span> 05:40, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES [[User:Unque|Unque]] ([[User talk:Unque|talk]]) 14:42, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:Recentlymaterialized|recentlymaterialized]] ([[User_talk:Recentlymaterialized|talk]]) 21:00, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
<br><br>
<br><br>


Line 77: Line 104:
* YES. [[User:Inthar|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar|talk]]) 15:04, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:Inthar|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar|talk]]) 15:04, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 15:11, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 15:11, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 18:30, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:CellularAutomaton|CellularAutomaton]] ([[User talk:CellularAutomaton|talk]]) 18:56, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 22:30, 9 February 2025 (UTC)"
* YES. [[User:VIxen|VIxen]] ([[User talk:VIxen|talk]]) 03:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
* Neutral. [[User:2^67-1|2^67-1]] ([[User talk:2^67-1|talk]]) 04:27, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 04:40, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:DotuXil|DotuXil]] <span style="color:#f50c7d">(i like microtones)</span> 05:40, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES [[User:Unque|Unque]] ([[User talk:Unque|talk]]) 14:42, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
<br><br>
<br><br>


Line 88: Line 123:
* YES. [[User:Inthar|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar|talk]]) 15:04, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:Inthar|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar|talk]]) 15:04, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 15:11, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 15:11, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 18:30, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:CellularAutomaton|CellularAutomaton]] ([[User talk:CellularAutomaton|talk]]) 18:56, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 22:30, 9 February 2025 (UTC)"
* YES. [[User:VIxen|VIxen]] ([[User talk:VIxen|talk]]) 03:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
* Neutral. [[User:2^67-1|2^67-1]] ([[User talk:2^67-1|talk]]) 04:27, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 04:40, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:DotuXil|DotuXil]] <span style="color:#f50c7d">(i like microtones)</span> 05:40, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
* YES. [[User:Unque|Unque]] ([[User talk:Unque|talk]]) 14:42, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
<br><br>
<br><br>


Line 106: Line 149:
; Options
; Options
* A. They should be treated just like any other page, anyone can edit them.
* A. They should be treated just like any other page, anyone can edit them.
* B. Any proposed edit must be first suggested on the talk page, and recieve more replies in favour than against, as of exactly 7 days after the first reply is posted.
* B. Any proposed edit must be first suggested on the talk page, and receive more replies in favour than against, as of exactly 7 days after the first reply is posted.
* C. Any proposed edit must be first suggested in both a Discord poll in #wiki, and a Facebook poll in Xenwiki Work Group. It must recieve more yes votes than no votes on BOTH platforms, as of exactly 7 days after the poll is posted. If nobody votes at all on one of the platforms, that is considered a "yes" vote.
* C. Any proposed edit must be first suggested in both a Discord poll in #wiki, and a Facebook poll in Xenwiki Work Group. It must receive more yes votes than no votes on BOTH platforms, as of exactly 7 days after the poll is posted. If nobody votes at all on one of the platforms, that is considered a "yes" vote.
* D. Any proposed edit must be suggested to a bureaucrat on that bureaucrat's talk page, and the bureaucrat must say yes in order for it to be implemented.
* D. Any proposed edit must be suggested to a bureaucrat on that bureaucrat's talk page, and the bureaucrat must say yes in order for it to be implemented.
* E. Any proposed edit must be suggested to any admin on that admin's talk page, and the admin must say yes in order for it to be implemented.
* E. Any proposed edit must be suggested to any admin on that admin's talk page, and the admin must say yes in order for it to be implemented.
Line 121: Line 164:
* A. See Sintel's comment above. [[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 15:11, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* A. See Sintel's comment above. [[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 15:11, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A. [[User:Eli5121|Eli5121]] ([[User talk:Eli5121|talk]]) 15:28, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A. [[User:Eli5121|Eli5121]] ([[User talk:Eli5121|talk]]) 15:28, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A. [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 18:30, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* A. see sintel's reasoning. [[User:CellularAutomaton|CellularAutomaton]] ([[User talk:CellularAutomaton|talk]]) 18:56, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A, B, E. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 19:11, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* A. Wiki should be open and peer reviewed and vandalism attempts always can be reverted if needed. [[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 22:32, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A, B, E. [[User:VIxen|VIxen]] ([[User talk:VIxen|talk]]) 03:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A (see Sintel's reasoning). [[User:2^67-1|2^67-1]] ([[User talk:2^67-1|talk]]) 04:27, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A (see Sintel's reasoning). In addition, any content that is deemed worthy of long-term conservation should be hosted elsewhere than on a wiki, since a wiki is by nature constantly evolving, being subject to community edits over time, especially since the Xen Wiki which allows for original research. [[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 04:40, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A. [[User:DotuXil|DotuXil]] <span style="color:#f50c7d">(i like microtones)</span> 05:40, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
* A.  I agree largely with Sintel's reasoning above. [[User:Unque|Unque]] ([[User talk:Unque|talk]]) 14:42, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A. [[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 16:17, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
* I'm good with A or B. Also F: Create a page category tag thingy to say "This is a legacy page, because its primary author is deceased. Use the discussion tab to suggest changes." In other words, I'm proposing B but without any formal process or deadline on what we do in response. [[User:Xenjacob|Xenjacob]] ([[User talk:Xenjacob|talk]]) 03:18, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
<br><br>
<br><br>


Line 143: Line 197:
* A. See Sintel's comment above. [[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 15:11, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* A. See Sintel's comment above. [[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 15:11, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A. [[User:Eli5121|Eli5121]] ([[User talk:Eli5121|talk]]) 15:28, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A. [[User:Eli5121|Eli5121]] ([[User talk:Eli5121|talk]]) 15:28, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* A. see sintel's reasoning. [[User:CellularAutomaton|CellularAutomaton]] ([[User talk:CellularAutomaton|talk]]) 18:56, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A, C, F, G. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 19:11, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* A. Experts opinion should be validated by clarity of argumentation, not the expert status. [[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 22:33, 9 February 2025 (UTC)"
* The options I'm okay with are A, C, E, G. [[User:VIxen|VIxen]] ([[User talk:VIxen|talk]]) 03:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A (see Sintel's reasoning), though not much of us are good enough at maths, so I'd also pick F and G. [[User:2^67-1|2^67-1]] ([[User talk:2^67-1|talk]]) 04:27, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A (see Sintel's reasoning). All information on the wiki, mathematical or not, can be subject to factual verification by users, and I don't see why math as a field would be treated differently from history, psychoacoustics, instrument making, etc. Any voluntary user can contribute to such verification tasks, so far as they work in collaboration with the rest of the community. [[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 04:40, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A, C, E, G. [[User:DotuXil|DotuXil]] <span style="color:#f50c7d">(i like microtones)</span> 05:40, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
* A; I again agree with Sintel's comment. [[User:Unque|Unque]] ([[User talk:Unque|talk]]) 14:42, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A. [[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 16:17, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A. Additionally I recommend looking into the feasibility of adding a checkbox when editing, like "minor edit" but, "mathematical correction". [[User:Xenjacob|Xenjacob]] ([[User talk:Xenjacob|talk]]) 03:23, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
<br><br>
<br><br>


Line 152: Line 216:


; Votes
; Votes
* The options I'm okay with are A, B. [[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 07:22, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are C (by Sintel). [[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 07:22, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
** ''Edited to add support for Sintel’s proposal. [[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 21:32, 9 February 2025 (UTC)''
* The options I'm okay with are A, B. [[User:Fitzgerald Lee|Fitzgerald Lee]] ([[User talk:Fitzgerald Lee|talk]]) 07:54, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A, B. [[User:Fitzgerald Lee|Fitzgerald Lee]] ([[User talk:Fitzgerald Lee|talk]]) 07:54, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* AB [[User:Xenoindex|Xenoindex]] ([[User talk:Xenoindex|talk]]) 07:57, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* AB [[User:Xenoindex|Xenoindex]] ([[User talk:Xenoindex|talk]]) 07:57, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
Line 159: Line 224:
* The options I'm okay with are A, C. [[User:Francium|Francium]] ([[User talk:Francium|talk]]) 13:24, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A, C. [[User:Francium|Francium]] ([[User talk:Francium|talk]]) 13:24, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A, B, C. [[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 15:11, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A, B, C. [[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 15:11, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* AC. [[User:CellularAutomaton|CellularAutomaton]] ([[User talk:CellularAutomaton|talk]]) 18:56, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A, C (by Sintel). [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 19:11, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* C. In my opinion it should be limited amount of trusted members of community, who are liked by everyone and uncontroversial people, who can decide who can have and what type of permissions on the wiki, and who don't change often. [[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 22:34, 9 February 2025 (UTC)"
* The options I'm okay with are B, C (Sintel's proposal). [[User:VIxen|VIxen]] ([[User talk:VIxen|talk]]) 03:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are C (by Sintel). [[User:2^67-1|2^67-1]] ([[User talk:2^67-1|talk]]) 04:27, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are C (by Sintel). [[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 04:40, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A, B, C (Sintel's proposal). [[User:DotuXil|DotuXil]] <span style="color:#f50c7d">(i like microtones)</span> 05:40, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A, B, C (by Sintel). [[User:Unque|Unque]] ([[User talk:Unque|talk]]) 14:42, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A and C (by Sintel). [[User:Recentlymaterialized|recentlymaterialized]] ([[User_talk:Recentlymaterialized|talk]]) 21:00, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
<br><br>
<br><br>


Line 168: Line 242:


; Votes
; Votes
* The options I'm okay with are A, B. [[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 07:22, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are C (by Sintel). [[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 07:22, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
** ''Edited to add support for Sintel’s proposal. [[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 21:32, 9 February 2025 (UTC)''
* The options I'm okay with are A. [[User:Fitzgerald Lee|Fitzgerald Lee]] ([[User talk:Fitzgerald Lee|talk]]) 07:54, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A. [[User:Fitzgerald Lee|Fitzgerald Lee]] ([[User talk:Fitzgerald Lee|talk]]) 07:54, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* AB [[User:Xenoindex|Xenoindex]] ([[User talk:Xenoindex|talk]]) 07:57, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* AB [[User:Xenoindex|Xenoindex]] ([[User talk:Xenoindex|talk]]) 07:57, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
Line 175: Line 250:
* The options I'm okay with are C. [[User:Francium|Francium]] ([[User talk:Francium|talk]]) 13:25, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are C. [[User:Francium|Francium]] ([[User talk:Francium|talk]]) 13:25, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A, B, C. [[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 15:11, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A, B, C. [[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 15:11, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* AC. [[User:CellularAutomaton|CellularAutomaton]] ([[User talk:CellularAutomaton|talk]]) 18:56, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are C (by Sintel). [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 19:11, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* C. In my opinion it should be limited and constant amount of trusted members of community, who are liked by everyone and uncontroversial people, who can decide who can have and what type of permissions on the wiki, and who don't change often. [[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 22:36, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A, B, C (Sintel's proposal, except that the incumbent bureaucrat(s) must be given merely as much power as ordinary editors over the appointment decision, and that editors may vote to remove a bureaucrat by 4/5 majority, even a lone one who then becomes a lame duck with limited powers, and hold an urgent election/discussion for replacement). [[User:VIxen|VIxen]] ([[User talk:VIxen|talk]]) 03:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are C (by Sintel). [[User:2^67-1|2^67-1]] ([[User talk:2^67-1|talk]]) 04:27, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are C (by Sintel). [[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 04:40, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are C (Sintel's proposal). [[User:DotuXil|DotuXil]] <span style="color:#f50c7d">(i like microtones)</span> 05:40, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A, B, C (by Sintel). [[User:Unque|Unque]] ([[User talk:Unque|talk]]) 14:42, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
<br><br>
<br><br>


Line 184: Line 267:
* D. A page is created where anyone can nominate a page to be locked or unlocked. A yes/no vote is then held using the same rules as the yes/no votes on this page, except that ONLY admins can vote. The admins must enforce the results of the vote.
* D. A page is created where anyone can nominate a page to be locked or unlocked. A yes/no vote is then held using the same rules as the yes/no votes on this page, except that ONLY admins can vote. The admins must enforce the results of the vote.
* E. Any proposed lock or unlock must be first suggested in both a Discord poll in #wiki, and a Facebook poll in Xenwiki Work Group. It must recieve more yes votes than no votes on BOTH platforms, as of exactly 7 days after the poll is posted. If nobody votes at all on one of the platforms, that is considered a "yes" vote. The admins must enforce the results of the vote.
* E. Any proposed lock or unlock must be first suggested in both a Discord poll in #wiki, and a Facebook poll in Xenwiki Work Group. It must recieve more yes votes than no votes on BOTH platforms, as of exactly 7 days after the poll is posted. If nobody votes at all on one of the platforms, that is considered a "yes" vote. The admins must enforce the results of the vote.
* F. None of these options are acceptable, the community should be asked to invent a different option which can then be voted on.
* F. There should be a clear protection policy (analogous to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Protection_policy Wikipedia's protection policy]).
* G. None of these options are acceptable, the community should be asked to invent a different option which can then be voted on.


; Votes
; Votes
* The options I'm okay with are A, B, C, D. [[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 07:22, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are F (by Sintel). [[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 07:22, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
** ''Edited to add support for Sintel’s proposal. [[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 21:32, 9 February 2025 (UTC)''
* The options I'm okay with are A, B, C. [[User:Fitzgerald Lee|Fitzgerald Lee]] ([[User talk:Fitzgerald Lee|talk]]) 07:54, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A, B, C. [[User:Fitzgerald Lee|Fitzgerald Lee]] ([[User talk:Fitzgerald Lee|talk]]) 07:54, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* ABCD [[User:Xenoindex|Xenoindex]] ([[User talk:Xenoindex|talk]]) 07:57, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* ABCD [[User:Xenoindex|Xenoindex]] ([[User talk:Xenoindex|talk]]) 07:57, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
Line 194: Line 279:
: Protection should be used sparingly and mostly as a last resort. Leaving pages protected indefinitely without leaving any path to unprotect them (as is happening now!) is unacceptable on a wiki. [[User:Sintel|Sintel]] ([[User talk:Sintel|talk]]) 13:09, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
: Protection should be used sparingly and mostly as a last resort. Leaving pages protected indefinitely without leaving any path to unprotect them (as is happening now!) is unacceptable on a wiki. [[User:Sintel|Sintel]] ([[User talk:Sintel|talk]]) 13:09, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are F. [[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 13:17, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are F. [[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 13:17, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are F. (just added Sintel's to the list at top) [[User:Xenjacob|Xenjacob]] ([[User talk:Xenjacob|talk]]) 03:26, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are F. [[User:Francium|Francium]] ([[User talk:Francium|talk]]) 13:26, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are F. [[User:Francium|Francium]] ([[User talk:Francium|talk]]) 13:26, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are F. See Sintel's comment above. [[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 15:11, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are F. See Sintel's comment above. [[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 15:11, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are F. I fully agree with Sintel's above comment. [[User:Eli5121|Eli5121]] ([[User talk:Eli5121|talk]]) 15:28, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are F. I fully agree with Sintel's above comment. [[User:Eli5121|Eli5121]] ([[User talk:Eli5121|talk]]) 15:28, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are some combination of options C, D, and E for most cases, and option A in cases of flagrant misbehaviour like edit warring, vandalism, ''et cetera''. [[User:ArrowHead294|<math>\overrightarrow{\,\,\scriptsize\text{ArrowHead294}\,\,\,}</math>]] [[User talk:ArrowHead294|(speak to me)]] 15:56, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are some combination of options C, D, E, or F for most cases, and option A in cases of flagrant misbehaviour (edit warring, vandalism, ''et cetera''). [[User:ArrowHead294|<math>\overrightarrow{\,\,\scriptsize\text{ArrowHead294}\,\,\,}</math>]] [[User talk:ArrowHead294|(speak to me)]] 15:56, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* F. see sintel's comment. [[User:CellularAutomaton|CellularAutomaton]] ([[User talk:CellularAutomaton|talk]]) 18:56, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A, F (by Sintel). Any voting process is too impractically slow for occasions where protection is in need. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 09:52, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
* F. see sintel's comment. [[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 22:38, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
* The option I'm okay with is F: allow locks and unlocks both by any admin as in A (for speed) and by popular vote as in C. In the latter case, editors may also vote on a page-specific moratorium on admin locks. [[User:VIxen|VIxen]] ([[User talk:VIxen|talk]]) 03:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A, C, and D. [[User:2^67-1|2^67-1]] ([[User talk:2^67-1|talk]]) 04:27, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are F (by Sintel). I assume that the protection policy would cover most needs, without requiring any community voting since the situations are clearly identifiable by the admins, and that exceptional situations could be treated in a case-by-case approach. [[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 04:40, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are F (Sintel's proposal). [[User:DotuXil|DotuXil]] <span style="color:#f50c7d">(i like microtones)</span> 05:40, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are A, F (by Sintel). [[User:Unque|Unque]] ([[User talk:Unque|talk]]) 14:42, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
* The options I'm okay with are F (by Sintel). [[User:Recentlymaterialized|recentlymaterialized]] ([[User_talk:Recentlymaterialized|talk]]) 21:00, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
 
<br><br>
 
== Final results ==
 
=== Question 1 ===
Yes, FloraC will be granted bureaucrat permissions. (100% of 18 votes).
<br><br>
 
=== Question 2 ===
Yes, Fredg999 will be granted sysop permissions. (100% of 18 votes).
<br><br>
 
=== Question 3 ===
Yes, Fredg999 will be granted interface admin permissions. (100% of 18 votes).
<br><br>
 
=== Question 4 ===
Yes, Lériendil will be granted sysop permissions. (87.5% of 16 votes).
<br><br>
 
=== Question 5 ===
Yes, Lériendil will be granted interface admin permissions. (87.5% of 16 votes).
<br><br>
 
=== Question 6 ===
A. RTT pages (including Gene's) will be treated just the same as any other wiki page, not subject to extra protections just because they are RTT pages. (100% of 18 voters).
<br><br>
 
=== Question 7 ===
A. Mathematical content will be treated just the same as any other wiki content, any editor can check and update it. (100% of 17 voters).
<br><br>
 
=== Question 8 ===
C (Sintel). Any future admin nominations or removals should be discussed with everyone giving their opinions freely. After a set period the discussion closes and a bureaucrat reviews all of the arguments, and makes the final decision. The outcome should be based on community consensus (near unanimity) and not majority vote. (87.5% of 16 voters).
<br><br>
 
=== Question 9 ===
C (Sintel). Any future bureaucrat nominations or removals should be discussed with everyone giving their opinions freely. After a set period the discussion closes and another bureaucrat reviews all of the arguments, and makes the final decision. The outcome should be based on community consensus (near unanimity) and not majority vote. (86.7% of 15 voters).
<br><br>
 
=== Question 10 ===
F (Sintel). There should be a clear page protection policy (analogous to Wikipedia's protection policy). Protection can be done at the discretion of an admin, but the reasoning and duration should be clearly outlined on the talk page. To quote the Wikipedia policy:
 
"''Applying page protection solely as a preemptive measure is contrary to the open nature of Wikipedia and is generally not allowed. Instead, protection is used when vandalism, disruption, or abuse by multiple users is occurring at a frequency that warrants protection''."
 
Protection should be used sparingly and mostly as a last resort. Leaving pages protected indefinitely without leaving any path to unprotect them (as is happening now!) is unacceptable on a wiki.
 
(72% of 18 voters).
<br><br>