User talk:BudjarnLambeth: Difference between revisions

(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)

Line 10:

:Thank you for letting me know that :) I will change my user preferences accordingly. --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 22:30, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

== Category of individual temperaments ==

Plz note that ''Category:Temperaments'' is used for main namespace individual temperament pages. Category pages of these individual temperaments such as ''Category:Superpyth'' should be under ''Category:Category by temperaments''. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 06:02, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

: Alright, I will do that from now on. Thanks for letting me know :) --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 06:03, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

== Lalagu and 1/7 comma ==

Please note that while lalagu (12 & 79) sounds indistinguishable from 1/7-comma meantone, it's far from being "extremely close" to it as they use a drastically different mapping for 5. Besides, it is fundamentally a different comma to 81/80. [[User:Eliora|Eliora]] ([[User talk:Eliora|talk]]) 18:24, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

: Before I touched the 91edo article, it had lalagu (12 & 97) and didn't have meantone. I figured there was probably some special reason why that was the case and didn't want to mess it up so that's why I left lalagu in place. Feel free to change whatever needs to be changed to make the articles accurate. --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 09:43, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

== Octave numbering and exponents ==

Budjarn, I just came across your latest edits to the 128afdo page, where we read that the 8th Octave Overtone Tuning

''"…consists of harmonics of the harmonic series, numbers 128 (28, hence 8th octave) through 255."''

The octave number 8 is fine, but the exponent in ''(28, hence 8th octave)'' should be (8-1) = 7 instead of 8 – do you agree? (The Infobox AFDO calculates correctly.)

All the best - Holger ([[User:Holger Stoltenberg|Holger Stoltenberg]] ([[User talk:Holger Stoltenberg|talk]]) 16:50, 15 January 2025 (UTC))

:: I agree. That part of the text was actually not added by me, it was added on 08:41, 10 February 2020 by the page’s original author. Nonetheless I will correct it now. Thank you for pointing it out :) Kind regards, --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 01:59, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 :Thank you for letting me know that :) I will change my user preferences accordingly. --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 22:30, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
+== Category of individual temperaments ==
+Plz note that ''Category:Temperaments'' is used for main namespace individual temperament pages. Category pages of these individual temperaments such as ''Category:Superpyth'' should be under ''Category:Category by temperaments''. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 06:02, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
+: Alright, I will do that from now on. Thanks for letting me know :) --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 06:03, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
+== Lalagu and 1/7 comma ==
+Please note that while lalagu (12 & 79) sounds indistinguishable from 1/7-comma meantone, it's far from being "extremely close" to it as they use a drastically different mapping for 5. Besides, it is fundamentally a different comma to 81/80. [[User:Eliora|Eliora]] ([[User talk:Eliora|talk]]) 18:24, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
+: Before I touched the 91edo article, it had lalagu (12 & 97) and didn't have meantone. I figured there was probably some special reason why that was the case and didn't want to mess it up so that's why I left lalagu in place. Feel free to change whatever needs to be changed to make the articles accurate. --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 09:43, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
+== Octave numbering and exponents ==
+Budjarn, I just came across your latest edits to the 128afdo page, where we read that the 8th Octave Overtone Tuning
+''"…consists of harmonics of the harmonic series, numbers 128 (2<sup>8</sup>, hence 8<sup>th</sup> octave) through 255."''<br>
+The octave number 8 is fine, but the exponent in ''(2<sup>8</sup>, hence 8<sup>th</sup> octave)'' should be (8-1) = 7 instead of 8 – do you agree? <br>(The Infobox AFDO calculates correctly.)<br>
+All the best - Holger ([[User:Holger Stoltenberg|Holger Stoltenberg]] ([[User talk:Holger Stoltenberg|talk]]) 16:50, 15 January 2025 (UTC))
+:: I agree. That part of the text was actually not added by me, it was added on 08:41, 10 February 2020 by the page’s original author. Nonetheless I will correct it now. Thank you for pointing it out :) Kind regards, --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 01:59, 16 January 2025 (UTC)