User:Dummy index/Chromatic pairs and how we define haplotonic: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

VisualWikitext

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-(WIP)
+= Proposal to simplify the definition =
+* In order to distinguish between the fixed category of [[:Category:Haplotonic scales]], etc., and the reciprocal relationship (haplotonic) + (albitonic) = (chromatic), the latter will be called, for example, MOS triplet. Every 3 successive generations of MOS that satisfies the above relationship will be called a MOS triplet.
+** Or moshaplotonic as a parent MOS, moschromatic as a descendant MOS, like that [[moschroma]] and [[mosdiesis]] are relative from any MOS scale of interest.
+* If the number of notes in the scale is important, consider using the [[Pentatonic]] and [[Heptatonic]] pages.
+* Based on the above equation and the nature of MOS, the chromatic must be a direct descendant of the albitonic. So I don't like the existence of mega-albitonic between albitonic and chromatic, even though the meanings of relational and categorical usages don't have to be exactly the same. (I will also withdraw the mini-albitonic that I said.)
+* Categorical haplotonic scales include the last MOS that s &ge; 125 ¢ and some subset of such scales. in <nowiki>[[Chromatic pairs]]</nowiki>, such subsets all may be labelled mini-haplotonic (even if there are more than one).
+* Categorical albitonic scale is the first MOS that s &lt; 125 ¢.
+** If the interval that appears is too narrow to be a semitone, it may be a [[Cluster MOS]].
+* Categorical chromatic scales include direct descendant of albitonic (by adding corresponding haplotonic) and further descendant <del>(by adding same haplotonic)</del>. in <nowiki>[[Chromatic pairs]]</nowiki>, such further descendants all may be labelled mega-chromatic (even if there are more than one).
+= Memos =
 I couldn't find a comprehensive explanation of haplotonic, so I'm going to consider the current situation in my own way.