Talk:K*N subgroups: Difference between revisions

WikispacesArchive>Mike Battaglia
m Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' <span style="color:#800000">''...
Dummy index (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WSArchiveLink}}
{{WSArchiveLink}}
== Termination condition ==
<q>When two successive values i and i+1 lead to the same normal list</q>
This may cause termination too early. For example... 5-limit 3*24 subgroup of 24edo, I want a result "2.3.125 subgroup", but no additional base at i=2, cause terminating the algorithm and result in "2.3 subgroup". Simply it should be do up to i=k.
--[[User:Dummy index|Dummy index]] ([[User talk:Dummy index|talk]]) 13:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Hmm, subgroup may be extended by this → <q>add to that a basis for the commas of the k*N patent val</q>
Commas are all unison, 0 is divisible by k, not intrusive.
Ah, before that, 5-limit 24edo is enfactored... Sorry.
--[[User:Dummy index|Dummy index]] ([[User talk:Dummy index|talk]]) 14:55, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
New example, 5-limit 9*19 subgroup of 19edo. Because 3 and 5 are equally flattened on 19edo, patent val of 171edo maps these to 1\171 sharpened than intervals of 19edo, respectively. i=1 and i=2 result in intervals {{(}}1/1{{)}}(*2^n), its subgroup is 2-limit. Add commas (such as unimodular basis) then we gain only 2.3^171.3^8*5 subgroup. In this case we need at least i=5, {{(}}1/1, 3^5*5^4, 3^4*5^5{{)}} then we gain 2.3^9.3^8*5 subgroup. And of course, in 3-limit, we need i=9 to gain 2.3^9 subgroup. --[[User:Dummy index|Dummy index]] ([[User talk:Dummy index|talk]]) 14:07, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Return to "K*N subgroups" page.