User:BudjarnLambeth/Possible convention for temperament pages: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
Changed KE to CWE for now because the contents of "Dave Keenan & Douglas Blumeyer's guide to RTT: alternative complexities" contradict what I've heard from Mike, and it looks like there's been confusion about what exactly KE corresponds to for a long time, so for now I'll just stick with CWE to be safe. |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
(This is a proposal only, it is not | (This is a proposal only, it is not an actual convention at the moment.) | ||
== 1 tuning == | == 1 tuning == | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
List all tunings in a dot point list. | List all tunings in a dot point list. | ||
If | If CWE tuning is available, list it first. | ||
List pure-octave tunings first and tempered-octave tunings last. | List pure-octave tunings first and tempered-octave tunings last. | ||
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
Optimal tunings: | Optimal tunings: | ||
* [[ | * [[CWE]]: ~2 = 1200.0, ~3/2 = 696.982 | ||
* [[POTE]]: ~2 = 1200.0, ~3/2 = 697.003 | * [[POTE]]: ~2 = 1200.0, ~3/2 = 697.003 | ||
* [[TE]]: ~2 = 1199.582, ~3/2 = 696.761 | * [[TE]]: ~2 = 1199.582, ~3/2 = 696.761 | ||
| Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
List 2 tunings in a plain dot point list. List all other tunings below these, in a collapsible databox (collapsed by default). | List 2 tunings in a plain dot point list. List all other tunings below these, in a collapsible databox (collapsed by default). | ||
CWE and TE should always be included in the plain dot point list if you know them. | |||
Both lists should have pure-octave tunings at the top of the list and tempered-octave tunings at the bottom. | Both lists should have pure-octave tunings at the top of the list and tempered-octave tunings at the bottom. | ||
| Line 105: | Line 105: | ||
Optimal tunings: | Optimal tunings: | ||
* [[ | * [[CWE]]: ~2 = 1200.0, ~3/2 = 696.982 | ||
* [[TE]]: ~2 = 1199.582, ~3/2 = 696.761 | * [[TE]]: ~2 = 1199.582, ~3/2 = 696.761 | ||