Category talk:Equivalence interval: Difference between revisions

BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
Replied
BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
Said thanks for the help
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
:: To be honest, I don't think this category is even necessary or relevant anyway; of course the page about [[equave]]s is needed, and relevant pages can link to each other, but having a category for that seems unjustified, especially since the boundaries for that category will most likely remain fuzzy forever. --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 02:47, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
:: To be honest, I don't think this category is even necessary or relevant anyway; of course the page about [[equave]]s is needed, and relevant pages can link to each other, but having a category for that seems unjustified, especially since the boundaries for that category will most likely remain fuzzy forever. --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 02:47, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
::: I’m happy for the category to be deleted. Should I go ahead and remove the category from the pages I added it to? --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 02:52, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
::: I’m happy for the category to be deleted. Should I go ahead and remove the category from the pages I added it to? --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 02:52, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
:::: I can handle it with my category edits accounts, it'll be faster using Cat-a-lot. --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 02:56, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
::::: Awesome, thank you for doing that Fredg999 :) --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 02:57, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Return to "Equivalence interval" page.