User talk:FloraC/Critique on D&D's terminology: Difference between revisions
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) |
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) →Re: Prime-count vector: new section |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
I just went ahead and deleted that whole section. | I just went ahead and deleted that whole section. | ||
--[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 00:41, 4 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Re: Prime-count vector == | |||
I disagree that we use "vector" inaccurately. Maybe you don't understand that physicists, engineers, computer scientists, and (most importantly for RTT) linear algebraicists use the term "vector" very differently from the way group theorists use it. I expect that your concerns will seem arcane to our target readership, just as you apparently consider us "ridiculous" to say that a vector is a presentational form, that 81/80 is a quotient and not a vector, and that [-4 4 -1⟩ is its vector form. | |||
--[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 00:41, 4 May 2023 (UTC) | --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 00:41, 4 May 2023 (UTC) | ||