Talk:29edo: Difference between revisions

Line 10:

While these intervals can still be used in a way or another as useful tones in a piece of music, they don't correspond to anything.

Moreover, music is fundamentally the art of numbers made audible. This is something that was already known in antiquity. That's why I believe that what is completely outside the "grid of numbers" and the "harmonic grids" that emerge from it does not truly correspond to what music is fundamentally nor to the actual functioning of hearing.

~~For example, and~~ for this reason, I believe that most of what was composed in the Second Viennese School does not truly correspond to what music is deeply about, although it is interesting to analyse intellectually.

Moreover, music is fundamentally the art of numbers made audible. This is something that was already known in antiquity. That's why I believe that what is completely outside the "grid of numbers" and the "harmonic grids" that emerge from it does not truly correspond to what music is fundamentally nor to the actual functioning of hearing (for this reason, I believe that most of what was composed in the Second Viennese School does not truly correspond to what music is deeply about, although it is interesting to analyse intellectually).

This is why I say that logarithmic phi and pi are not musical.

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 While these intervals can still be used in a way or another as useful tones in a piece of music, they don't correspond to anything.
-Moreover, music is fundamentally the art of numbers made audible. This is something that was already known in antiquity. That's why I believe that what is completely outside the "grid of numbers" and the "harmonic grids" that emerge from it does not truly correspond to what music is fundamentally nor to the actual functioning of hearing.
-For example, and for this reason, I believe that most of what was composed in the Second Viennese School does not truly correspond to what music is deeply about, although it is interesting to analyse intellectually.
+Moreover, music is fundamentally the art of numbers made audible. This is something that was already known in antiquity. That's why I believe that what is completely outside the "grid of numbers" and the "harmonic grids" that emerge from it does not truly correspond to what music is fundamentally nor to the actual functioning of hearing (for this reason, I believe that most of what was composed in the Second Viennese School does not truly correspond to what music is deeply about, although it is interesting to analyse intellectually).
 This is why I say that logarithmic phi and pi are not musical.