Talk:29edo: Difference between revisions
Contribution (talk | contribs) |
Contribution (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
While these intervals can still be used in a way or another in a | While these intervals can still be used in a way or another as useful tones in a piece of music, they don't correspond to anything. | ||
Moreover, music is fundamentally the art of numbers made audible. This is something that was already known in antiquity. That's why I believe that what is completely outside the "grid of numbers" and the "harmonic grids" that emerge from it does not truly correspond to what music is fundamentally nor to the actual functioning of hearing. | |||
For example, and for this reason, I believe that most of what was composed in the Second Viennese School does not truly correspond to what music is deeply about, although it is interesting to analyse intellectually. | |||
When it comes to acoustic constants, we are truly hearing the | This is why I say that logarithmic phi and pi are not musical. | ||
When it comes to acoustic constants, we are truly hearing the mathematical constants phi = 1.6180 and pi = 3.1416 | |||
Acoustic constants are the only "musical ones". | |||