Composing Powerstart: Difference between revisions

Wikispaces>FREEZE
No edit summary
Fredg999 category edits (talk | contribs)
m Categories
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
''Musicians and composers just getting into the area of microtuning might, in an initial survey of the available resources on tuning around the web, encounter a barrage of intimidating jargon and mathematical concepts. Fortunately, a composer or player need not worry about the math side of things! This article suggests a number of ways to jump right in and start putting the products of tuning theory to work.''
''Musicians and composers just getting into the area of microtuning might, in an initial survey of the available resources on tuning around the web, encounter a barrage of intimidating jargon and mathematical concepts. Fortunately, a composer or player need not worry about the math side of things! This article suggests a number of ways to jump right in and start putting the products of tuning theory to work.''


{| class="wikitable"
Quoted from the Xenharmonic Alliance II, January 21 2013:
|-
| | Quoted from the Xenharmonic Alliance II, January 21 2013:


-----
==Math: Use as much or as little as you'd like==
 
===Math: Use as much or as little as you'd like===
''Mike Battaglia wrote:''
''Mike Battaglia wrote:''


=====<span style=""> "Tuning math is complex. But, if you're a composer, you don't need to ever worry about it. You don't ever need to know what a val is, or what a wedgie is, or what an epimorphic scale is, if you don't want. You don't need to learn how matrix multiplication works or deal with any of that. Those things are useful mathematical constructions which make it easier to communicate, program, and reason about the topic at hand, but they're not anything that a musician should ever, in general, have to know about to write microtonal music.</span>=====
"Tuning math is complex. But, if you're a composer, you don't need to ever worry about it. You don't ever need to know what a val is, or what a wedgie is, or what an epimorphic scale is, if you don't want. You don't need to learn how matrix multiplication works or deal with any of that. Those things are useful mathematical constructions which make it easier to communicate, program, and reason about the topic at hand, but they're not anything that a musician should ever, in general, have to know about to write microtonal music.


=====<span style=""> If, on the other hand, you DO want to learn tuning math, a basic undergraduate linear algebra course will enable you to understand about 90% of it if we phrase it a certain way.</span>=====
If, on the other hand, you DO want to learn tuning math, a basic undergraduate linear algebra course will enable you to understand about 90% of it if we phrase it a certain way.


=====<span style=""> But if you don't, then you don't need to. Just ask here for a tuning system and we'll recommend you like a hundred to use, along with some associated scales, and some suggestions for using them. Then it's up to you to go nuts and write. That's all it requires."</span>=====
But if you don't, then you don't need to. Just ask here for a tuning system and we'll recommend you like a hundred to use, along with some associated scales, and some suggestions for using them. Then it's up to you to go nuts and write. That's all it requires."


-----
''<span style="">Keenan Pepper wrote:</span>''


<span style="">"</span>And the way to really understand regular temperaments without bothering with all the math is:
''Keenan Pepper wrote:''


<ul><li>Learn a reasonable amount about [[Just_intonation|just intonation]]. Things like "[[Harmonic_Limit|prime limit]]" and "[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otonality_and_Utonality otonality]" shouldn't scare you. Being familiar with the whole 11-limit [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tonality_diamond tonality diamond] is a good thing.</li><li>For each [[Regular_Temperaments|temperament]] you're interested in, learn how the different tempered JI intervals relate to each other in that temperament. For example, in [[Porcupine|porcupine]], two 11/10s equals one 6/5, and that interval (11/10) also represents 12/11 and 10/9 at the same time.</li></ul>You can express this in a complicated mathematical way with linear alegbra, but that's completely unnecessary if you understand it in a musical way as relationships between intervals you're already familiar with."
"And the way to really understand regular temperaments without bothering with all the math is:


-----
*Learn a reasonable amount about [[just intonation]]. Things like "[[Harmonic_Limit|prime limit]]" and "[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otonality_and_Utonality otonality]" shouldn't scare you. Being familiar with the whole 11-limit [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tonality_diamond tonality diamond] is a good thing.
*For each [[Regular_Temperaments|temperament]] you're interested in, learn how the different tempered JI intervals relate to each other in that temperament. For example, in [[porcupine]], two 11/10s equals one 6/5, and that interval (11/10) also represents 12/11 and 10/9 at the same time.
*You can express this in a complicated mathematical way with linear alegbra, but that's completely unnecessary if you understand it in a musical way as relationships between intervals you're already familiar with."


===Porcupine===
==Porcupine==
''Mike Battaglia wrote:''
''Mike Battaglia wrote:''


Line 32: Line 28:
If you don't mind a bit less accuracy in representing harmonic ratios, the above temperament also exists in [[15edo|15-EDO]], except the diatonic-sized scale is now 3 2 2 2 2 2 2, the superdiatonic is 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2, and the chromatic scale is all of 15-EDO. 15-EDO also has a really nice "symmetrical diatonic" scale, called the Blackwood-10 scale, which is 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1. Play around with major and minor chords in this scale a bit, and transpose them up and down the shape of the scale, and you'll see why it's so magical - the circle of fifths is only five steps long."
If you don't mind a bit less accuracy in representing harmonic ratios, the above temperament also exists in [[15edo|15-EDO]], except the diatonic-sized scale is now 3 2 2 2 2 2 2, the superdiatonic is 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2, and the chromatic scale is all of 15-EDO. 15-EDO also has a really nice "symmetrical diatonic" scale, called the Blackwood-10 scale, which is 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1. Play around with major and minor chords in this scale a bit, and transpose them up and down the shape of the scale, and you'll see why it's so magical - the circle of fifths is only five steps long."


-----
==World Music Scales==
 
===World Music Scales===
If you don't care about harmonic ratios at all, but perhaps instead care about world music, then you might enjoy [[16edo|16-EDO]], which contains in it a wonderful extension of both gamelan music and Chopi timbila music; 5 2 2 5 2 is a great pelog and 3 3 3 4 3 works as slendro.
If you don't care about harmonic ratios at all, but perhaps instead care about world music, then you might enjoy [[16edo|16-EDO]], which contains in it a wonderful extension of both gamelan music and Chopi timbila music; 5 2 2 5 2 is a great pelog and 3 3 3 4 3 works as slendro.


Line 41: Line 35:
The 3 3 3 4 3 slendro can turn into the 3 3 3 1 3 3 "slendric-6" scale as well, though I prefer the 3 3 1 3 3 3 mode. This scale is nice because it sounds kind of like a "warped diatonic" scale. Chromatically altering things by 2 steps here, instead of 1 step, sounds really nice.
The 3 3 3 4 3 slendro can turn into the 3 3 3 1 3 3 "slendric-6" scale as well, though I prefer the 3 3 1 3 3 3 mode. This scale is nice because it sounds kind of like a "warped diatonic" scale. Chromatically altering things by 2 steps here, instead of 1 step, sounds really nice.


-----
World music fans might also like [[17edo]], which contains within it a system of scales very similar to the maqamat used in the middle east; [[24edo]] and [[31edo]] contain the same features but with better intonation, albeit at the cost of more notes, but you can always use smaller 17-note subsets if you want.
World music fans might also like [[17edo|17-EDO]], which contains within it a system of scales very similar to the maqamat used in the middle east; 24-EDO and 31-EDO contain the same features but with better intonation, albeit at the cost of more notes, but you can always use smaller 17-note subsets if you want.


17-EDO is also notable for containing a very interesting diatonic scale, for which the fifths are slightly sharp from what we're used to (and rather pleasantly, I think). As a result, the "major thirds" in the diatonic scale end up being closer to 9/7 than 5/4, and the "minor thirds" end up being closer to 7/6 than 6/5. Major chords are thus a bit less "sweet" than usual, though I don't mind them much, whereas minor chords are now 6:7:9 and have a sort of "subminor" flavor to them. You can also think about ditching "thirds," and instead harmonizing this scale in terms of 4:6:7 chords, of which there are four instead of three. I really like this because it has a very calm, quiet, meditative sound to it. This is called "superpyth" temperament, short for "superpythagorean," because the fifths are a bit sharp of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_tuning Pythagorean] (instead of a bit flat as usual).
17-EDO is also notable for containing a very interesting diatonic scale, for which the fifths are slightly sharp from what we're used to (and rather pleasantly, I think). As a result, the "major thirds" in the diatonic scale end up being closer to 9/7 than 5/4, and the "minor thirds" end up being closer to 7/6 than 6/5. Major chords are thus a bit less "sweet" than usual, though I don't mind them much, whereas minor chords are now 6:7:9 and have a sort of "subminor" flavor to them. You can also think about ditching "thirds," and instead harmonizing this scale in terms of 4:6:7 chords, of which there are four instead of three. I really like this because it has a very calm, quiet, meditative sound to it. This is called "superpyth" temperament, short for "superpythagorean," because the fifths are a bit sharp of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_tuning Pythagorean] (instead of a bit flat as usual).
Line 48: Line 41:
For people looking to mess with higher-limit stuff, 17-EDO is also really notable for giving decent 13-limit harmony, with the caveat that there's no good representation for 5/1 and other ratios containing 5.
For people looking to mess with higher-limit stuff, 17-EDO is also really notable for giving decent 13-limit harmony, with the caveat that there's no good representation for 5/1 and other ratios containing 5.


A really good paper on how 17-EDO offers a sort of bizarro-universe for the diatonic scale, which we might have gone with historically if things were different, can be found at [http://www.anaphoria.com/Secor17puzzle.pdf http://www.anaphoria.com/Secor17puzzle.pdf].
A really good paper on how 17-EDO offers a sort of bizarro-universe for the diatonic scale, which we might have gone with historically if things were different, can be found at http://www.anaphoria.com/Secor17puzzle.pdf .
 
-----


===Historical Tunings and Extended Meantone===
==Historical Tunings and Extended Meantone==
Some people are really interested in historic tunings for [[Meantone|meantone]], and perhaps extending them in ways that go beyond the [[12edo|12-EDO]] "closure" that we ended up going with. So if you really want to get away from the notion that C# has to equal Db, and want to explore extended meantone, there's a number of great options for you.
Some people are really interested in historic tunings for [[meantone]], and perhaps extending them in ways that go beyond the [[12edo]] "closure" that we ended up going with. So if you really want to get away from the notion that C# has to equal Db, and want to explore extended meantone, there's a number of great options for you.


A particularly well-known historical meantone tuning is 1/4-comma meantone, where the 3/2's are a bit flatter than we're used to, but the major thirds are exactly 5/4. What's particularly interesting is that this same tuning turns the augmented sixth, e.g. C-A#, into an almost exact 7/4 - so you can treat it as a 7-limit tuning.
A particularly well-known historical meantone tuning is 1/4-comma meantone, where the 3/2's are a bit flatter than we're used to, but the major thirds are exactly 5/4. What's particularly interesting is that this same tuning turns the augmented sixth, e.g. C-A#, into an almost exact 7/4 - so you can treat it as a 7-limit tuning.
Line 67: Line 58:
You can do all sorts of amazing stuff with 19-EDO if you want, and make it sound almost exactly like ordinary 12-EDO music too, but then depart from it into some rather mind-blowing stuff if you want.
You can do all sorts of amazing stuff with 19-EDO if you want, and make it sound almost exactly like ordinary 12-EDO music too, but then depart from it into some rather mind-blowing stuff if you want.


-----
==Higher Accuracy==
 
There are also the people who care about none of this, but really just want really well-intoned higher-limit chords. Gene Smith is certainly the person who's explored this style the most, though I also have a few things to say about it.
===Higher Accuracy===
There are also the people who care about none of this, but really just want really well-intoned higher-limit chords. <span style="">Gene Smith</span> is certainly the person who's explored this style the most, though I also have a few things to say about it.


These people already tend to know a bit of math related to JI, so I'll assume you know what a prime limit is and what ratios are below, as well as having some compositional idea of the sounds you're after.
These people already tend to know a bit of math related to JI, so I'll assume you know what a prime limit is and what ratios are below, as well as having some compositional idea of the sounds you're after.
Line 82: Line 71:
If that's still not accurate enough for you, and you insist on using an EDO, you have 41-EDO and 46-EDO, both of which handle the 13-limit very well, especially the latter. 41-EDO has very accurate 3/2's, even more so than 12-EDO, and is a "schismatic" temperament, which says that instead of 5/4 being four 3/2's minus a few octaves, it's now eight 4/3's minus a few octaves. In other words, spelled the usual way, C-E s no longer 5/4, but C-Fb is.
If that's still not accurate enough for you, and you insist on using an EDO, you have 41-EDO and 46-EDO, both of which handle the 13-limit very well, especially the latter. 41-EDO has very accurate 3/2's, even more so than 12-EDO, and is a "schismatic" temperament, which says that instead of 5/4 being four 3/2's minus a few octaves, it's now eight 4/3's minus a few octaves. In other words, spelled the usual way, C-E s no longer 5/4, but C-Fb is.


In contrast, 46-EDO has slightly sharp fifths, a bit less sharp than 17-EDO and well within tolerable range. It's also an excellent tuning for "sensi" temperament, which envisions a stack of 9/7's such that two of them makes 5/3, a continuation of this stack hits a number of 7-limit ratios very accurately, and in 46-EDO the 11-limit is supported as well. The sensi-9 scale is 5 5 7 5 5 7 5 7 (and its modes), and you should feel free to use this as a diatonic scale while modulating around and chromatically altering things by 2 steps out of 46 (this is the difference between the large and small step, or 7-5=2).
In contrast, 46-EDO has slightly sharp fifths, a bit less sharp than 17-EDO and well within tolerable range. It's also an excellent tuning for "sensi" temperament, which envisions a stack of 9/7's such that two of them makes 5/3, a continuation of this stack hits a number of 7-limit ratios very accurately, and in 46-EDO the 11-limit is [[support|supported]] as well. The sensi-9 scale is 5 5 7 5 5 7 5 7 (and its modes), and you should feel free to use this as a diatonic scale while modulating around and chromatically altering things by 2 steps out of 46 (this is the difference between the large and small step, or 7-5=2).


Once you get to 53-EDO, the 5-limit is so accurate that it's barely distinguishable from JI. If you want almost perfect 5-limit harmony in an EDO, 53-EDO is hard to beat. It also performs extremely well in the 13-limit. 53-EDO, along with 22-EDO and 31-EDO, also supports a very interesting temperament called "orwell," which can be envisioned as a chain of 7/6's, such that two of them makes a pretty decent 11/8, three of them makes a pretty decent 8/5, and seven of them makes a pretty decent 3/1. A good scale to mess around with is 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 2 in 22-EDO, or 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 3 in 31-EDO. I sort of hear this stack-of-7/6's temperament as being an evil twin to the more lighthearted stack-of-9/7's which is sensi temperament above.
Once you get to 53-EDO, the 5-limit is so accurate that it's barely distinguishable from JI. If you want almost perfect 5-limit harmony in an EDO, 53-EDO is hard to beat. It also performs extremely well in the 13-limit. 53-EDO, along with 22-EDO and 31-EDO, also supports a very interesting temperament called "orwell," which can be envisioned as a chain of 7/6's, such that two of them makes a pretty decent 11/8, three of them makes a pretty decent 8/5, and seven of them makes a pretty decent 3/1. A good scale to mess around with is 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 2 in 22-EDO, or 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 3 in 31-EDO. I sort of hear this stack-of-7/6's temperament as being an evil twin to the more lighthearted stack-of-9/7's which is sensi temperament above.
Line 92: Line 81:
If you like the 72-EDO approach but like 17-EDO, you might try 68-EDO as a similar thing.
If you like the 72-EDO approach but like 17-EDO, you might try 68-EDO as a similar thing.


-----
==More accuracy==
 
===More accuracy===
For people who don't care at all about EDOs, don't mind unequal chromatic scales and just want good harmony, there's a zillion options for you; Gene Smith will no doubt be able to add a lot to this, although I'm quite certain I've scared him off with this Margo-sized post here.
For people who don't care at all about EDOs, don't mind unequal chromatic scales and just want good harmony, there's a zillion options for you; Gene Smith will no doubt be able to add a lot to this, although I'm quite certain I've scared him off with this Margo-sized post here.


Line 109: Line 96:
There are so many good unequal 11-limit temperaments that it's almost impossible for me to write about them all here; if this is really what you're after, post more about the things that you want specifically, and I'll answer specific questions.
There are so many good unequal 11-limit temperaments that it's almost impossible for me to write about them all here; if this is really what you're after, post more about the things that you want specifically, and I'll answer specific questions.


-----
==More info pending: Mind-bending tunings, non-octave tunings, subgroup tunings==
 
===More info pending: Mind-bending tunings, non-octave tunings, subgroup tunings===
There are two more groups of people I have yet to address:
There are two more groups of people I have yet to address:


Line 119: Line 104:


I'd like to write something for those people, but I'm beat for now. I'm personally in both of these groups, so I've written something for everyone but me. Till next time..."
I'd like to write something for those people, but I'm beat for now. I'm personally in both of these groups, so I've written something for everyone but me. Till next time..."
| | <span style="color: #ffffff;">Fillertextisbeingusedtoshrinkthewidthofthatcolumnabit</span>
 
|}
[[Category:Overview]]
[[Category:composition]]
[[Category:starting_point]]
[[Category:theory]]