Talk:Target tuning: Difference between revisions

Line 28:

The "Minimax tuning" section of this page very briefly describes and gives a method for computing a tuning scheme which in D&D's guide is systematically named "held-octave OLD minimax-U". This method is explained in more detail here: [[Generator embedding optimization#Coinciding-damage method]]. I suggest this systematic tuning scheme name and link to more info should be provided. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 22:47, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

== Suggested improvement to the tie-breaking solution for the "Minimax" section ==

This page suggests that one should fall back to the miniRMS method to tie-break between tied minimax tunings, but that sort of misses the point of the problem. The two tied points are on extreme opposite ends of the slice of good solutions, and the optimum solution lies somewhere in between them. We don't want the tie-break to choose one or the other extreme; we want to find a better solution somewhere in between them. Instead, a power limit method should be used here, such as discussed [[Dave_Keenan_%26_Douglas_Blumeyer%27s_guide_to_RTT:_tuning_computation#Tie_breaking:_power_limit_method|here]]. (More context for this issue may also be found around this footnote: https://en.xen.wiki/w/Generator_embedding_optimization#cite_note-14 .) --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 22:51, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 The "Minimax tuning" section of this page very briefly describes and gives a method for computing a tuning scheme which in D&D's guide is systematically named "held-octave OLD minimax-U". This method is explained in more detail here: [[Generator embedding optimization#Coinciding-damage method]]. I suggest this systematic tuning scheme name and link to more info should be provided. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 22:47, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
+== Suggested improvement to the tie-breaking solution for the "Minimax" section ==
+This page suggests that one should fall back to the miniRMS method to tie-break between tied minimax tunings, but that sort of misses the point of the problem. The two tied points are on extreme opposite ends of the slice of good solutions, and the optimum solution lies somewhere in between them. We don't want the tie-break to choose one or the other extreme; we want to find a better solution somewhere in between them. Instead, a power limit method should be used here, such as discussed [[Dave_Keenan_%26_Douglas_Blumeyer%27s_guide_to_RTT:_tuning_computation#Tie_breaking:_power_limit_method|here]]. (More context for this issue may also be found around this footnote: https://en.xen.wiki/w/Generator_embedding_optimization#cite_note-14 .) --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 22:51, 30 January 2023 (UTC)