ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW
Please do not add any new discussion to this archive page.
All new discussion should go on Talk:Consistent.
Should the two pages linked in the 2nd paragraph be merged into this page?
- TallKite January 12, 2017, 01:58:40 PM UTC-0800
Yes, the articles have nearly the same text, I'd suggest to merge them into one. Also the here-links ("this list") are not acceptable.
- xenwolf January 13, 2017, 12:48:39 AM UTC-0800
re: what do I mean with "todo:reduce mathslang"
I think a definition somewhat closer to everyday language would be better for all the interested readers. I for instance had to read very carefully to grasp it (though I knew it before). Some readers will feel excluded, I'm afraid.
- xenwolf June 29, 2011, 01:26:40 AM UTC-0700
Mathematics is not slang, it is terminology. If you want to try to put something in other words, it's important to keep mathematical terminology also.
- genewardsmith June 29, 2011, 05:09:57 PM UTC-0700
Sorry, I could not resist to name the tag like this. The first draft was
"todo:reduce mathematical language"
and this was too long. I shortened it to
wich will be easy to understand -
and sorry: I did not want to offend you.
Now my problem: I think nearly *all* xenharmonic/microtonal/tuning interested
people are *very* *very* interested in understanding the underlying
But nobody has enough time to study maths - wouldn't it be possible to be both:
understandable *and* precise with the introductional text of each article.
BTW: I think maths is a pedagogical nightmare for most people - sadly.
And this is--first of all--the fault of the teachers
(at least of the vast majority of them).
- xenwolf June 30, 2011, 06:59:19 AM UTC-0700