Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Conduct policy - Revision history

Fredg999: Fredg999 moved page Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Conduct to Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Conduct policy: Improve title

2025-12-08T03:39:48Z

Fredg999 moved page Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Conduct to Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Conduct policy: Improve title

← Older revision	Revision as of 03:39, 8 December 2025
(No difference)

BudjarnLambeth: Added heading and tag to follow a proper talk page structure

2023-06-20T06:41:35Z

Added heading and tag to follow a proper talk page structure

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:41, 20 June 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
			== SyntheticThought, 19 March 2019 ==

	The site has needed a page like this for a long time. Because sometimes destructive people come along, blank pages or sections they don't like, call people names, etc. And when chided they invariably say some variation on "I NEVER AGREED TO THAT! I NEVER SAW THAT IN WRITING!"		The site has needed a page like this for a long time. Because sometimes destructive people come along, blank pages or sections they don't like, call people names, etc. And when chided they invariably say some variation on "I NEVER AGREED TO THAT! I NEVER SAW THAT IN WRITING!"
Line 20:		Line 21:

	So here we go. I welcome feedback on this, especially from people who are current editors on this wiki.		So here we go. I welcome feedback on this, especially from people who are current editors on this wiki.

			--SyntheticThought, 19 March 2019

FloraC: FloraC moved page Talk:Conduct to Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Conduct: For obvious reasons

2023-06-18T17:55:37Z

FloraC moved page Talk:Conduct to Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Conduct: For obvious reasons

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:55, 18 June 2023
(No difference)

SyntheticThought: section

2019-03-18T22:25:59Z

section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:25, 18 March 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:

	The site has needed a page like this for a long time. Because sometimes destructive people come along, blank pages they don't like, call people names, etc. And when chided they invariably say some variation on "I NEVER AGREED TO THAT! I NEVER SAW THAT IN WRITING!"		The site has needed a page like this for a long time. Because sometimes destructive people come along, blank pages or sections they don't like, call people names, etc. And when chided they invariably say some variation on "I NEVER AGREED TO THAT! I NEVER SAW THAT IN WRITING!"

	But with this page, we can point them here.		But with this page, we can point them here.
Line 10:		Line 10:
	This info is sort of included in the TOS, but that's long, this is short, practiacly no one reads TOS. (But they're good to have, to cover one's butt from the law.)		This info is sort of included in the TOS, but that's long, this is short, practiacly no one reads TOS. (But they're good to have, to cover one's butt from the law.)

	Also, the TOS doesn't spell out "you will be booted" if you vandalize, blank pages, call people names. This Conduct page spells it out.		Also, the TOS doesn't spell out "you will be booted" if you vandalize, blank pages or sections, call people names. This Conduct page spells it out.

SyntheticThought at 22:10, 18 March 2019

2019-03-18T22:10:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:10, 18 March 2019
Line 7:		Line 7:

	I think this should also be a link on the left sidebar, under "Other", just as one word, "Conduct", below one link that should be added, "Terms of Service."		I think this should also be a link on the left sidebar, under "Other", just as one word, "Conduct", below one link that should be added, "Terms of Service."

			This info is sort of included in the TOS, but that's long, this is short, practiacly no one reads TOS. (But they're good to have, to cover one's butt from the law.)

			Also, the TOS doesn't spell out "you will be booted" if you vandalize, blank pages, call people names. This Conduct page spells it out.

SyntheticThought at 22:08, 18 March 2019

2019-03-18T22:08:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:08, 18 March 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:

	The site has needed this for a long time. Because sometimes destructive people come along, blank pages they don't like, call people names, etc. And when chided they invariably say some variation on "I NEVER AGREED TO THAT!"		The site has needed a page like this for a long time. Because sometimes destructive people come along, blank pages they don't like, call people names, etc. And when chided they invariably say some variation on "I NEVER AGREED TO THAT! I NEVER SAW THAT IN WRITING!"

	But with this page, we can point them here.		But with this page, we can point them here.

SyntheticThought: added to talk page for Conduct page

2019-03-18T22:07:28Z

added to talk page for Conduct page

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:07, 18 March 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:

	The site has needed this for a long time. ~~So when discructive~~ people come along, ~~and~~ when chided say "I NEVER AGREED TO THAT!" ~~we can point to this.~~		The site has needed this for a long time. Because sometimes destructive people come along, blank pages they don't like, call people names, etc. And when chided they invariably say some variation on "I NEVER AGREED TO THAT!"

	~~I would like to see the sign up requiring reading~~ this page ~~and agreeing to it. There is now a very short form of that, one line, on the sign up~~, ~~that I asked Tyler to add and he did. But I would like it spelled out more~~.		But with this page, we can point them here.

			I would like to see the sign-up page requiring reading this page and agreeing to it. There is now a very short form of that, one line, on the sign up, that I asked Tyler to add and he did. But I think it should be spelled out more, as on this Conduct page.

	~~Kite~~, ~~Stephen Wiegel~~, ~~and Jacob (tae) have talked with me about needing more anti-troll controls~~.		I think this should also be a link on the left sidebar, under "Other", just as one word, "Conduct", below one link that should be added, "Terms of Service."

	I wrote this to be on the TOS (legal) page~~, but~~ Tyler and Mike B. pointed out that it should probably be a different page. (Tyler's note about that is on the Talk page for the TOS page, just search "Tyler" here
			Kite G, Stephen Weigel, and Jacob (tae) have talked with me about needing more anti-troll controls.

			I wrote this Conduct page text to be on the TOS (legal) page. But Tyler and Mike B. pointed out that it should probably be a different page.
			(Tyler's note about that is on the Talk page for the TOS page, just search "Tyler" here
	https://en.xen.wiki/w/Xenharmonic_Wiki_talk:Terms_of_Service ):		https://en.xen.wiki/w/Xenharmonic_Wiki_talk:Terms_of_Service ):

			So here we go. I welcome feedback on this, especially from people who are current editors on this wiki.

SyntheticThought: starting talk page.

2019-03-18T22:03:48Z

starting talk page.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:03, 18 March 2019
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Kite, Stephen Wiegel, and Jacob (tae) have talked with me about needing more anti-troll controls.		Kite, Stephen Wiegel, and Jacob (tae) have talked with me about needing more anti-troll controls.

	I wrote this to be on the TOS (legal) page, but Tyler and Mike B. pointed out that it should probably be a different page. (Tyler's note about that is on ~~this~~ page, just search "Tyler" here):		I wrote this to be on the TOS (legal) page, but Tyler and Mike B. pointed out that it should probably be a different page. (Tyler's note about that is on the Talk page for the TOS page, just search "Tyler" here
			https://en.xen.wiki/w/Xenharmonic_Wiki_talk:Terms_of_Service ):

SyntheticThought: Created page with " The site has needed this for a long time. So when discructive people come along, and when chided say "I NEVER AGREED TO THAT!" we can point to this. I would like to see the..."

2019-03-18T22:02:35Z

Created page with " The site has needed this for a long time. So when discructive people come along, and when chided say "I NEVER AGREED TO THAT!" we can point to this. I would like to see the..."

New page

The site has needed this for a long time. So when discructive people come along, and when chided say "I NEVER AGREED TO THAT!" we can point to this.

I would like to see the sign up requiring reading this page and agreeing to it. There is now a very short form of that, one line, on the sign up, that I asked Tyler to add and he did. But I would like it spelled out more.

Kite, Stephen Wiegel, and Jacob (tae) have talked with me about needing more anti-troll controls.

I wrote this to be on the TOS (legal) page, but Tyler and Mike B. pointed out that it should probably be a different page. (Tyler's note about that is on this page, just search "Tyler" here):