Xenharmonic Wiki:Elections - Revision history

FloraC: Update

2025-10-29T08:16:07Z

Update

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:16, 29 October 2025
Line 7:		Line 7:
	You can also add comments or questions for the candidate under 'comments'.		You can also add comments or questions for the candidate under 'comments'.

	==Fredg999 for bureaucrat (Oct 2025)==		== Fredg999 for bureaucrat (Oct 2025) ==

	Voting is open for 1 week after the 3rd vote has been cast. Voting is now closed.		Voting is open for 1 week after the 3rd vote has been cast. Voting is now closed.
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Please place any future elections above this one, so that the most recent ones are always on top.		Please place any future elections above this one, so that the most recent ones are always on top.

	===Nomination===		=== Nomination ===

	I would like to nominate [[User:Fredg999]] for [[Xenharmonic_Wiki:Bureaucrats\|bureaucrat]] (he is already an admin currently). The wiki currently has very few active bureaucrats and I think it's a good idea to have at least one more.		I would like to nominate [[User:Fredg999]] for [[Xenharmonic_Wiki:Bureaucrats\|bureaucrat]] (he is already an admin currently). The wiki currently has very few active bureaucrats and I think it's a good idea to have at least one more.
Line 21:		Line 21:
	– [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 18:45, 21 October 2025 (UTC)		– [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 18:45, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

	===Support===		=== Support ===
	# '''Support'''. As a nominator. – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 18:45, 21 October 2025 (UTC)		# '''Support'''. As a nominator. – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 18:45, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
	# '''Support'''. Absolutely. – [[User:Xenoindex\|Xenoindex]] ([[User talk:Xenoindex\|talk]]) 22:10, 21 October 2025 (UTC)		# '''Support'''. Absolutely. – [[User:Xenoindex\|Xenoindex]] ([[User talk:Xenoindex\|talk]]) 22:10, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
Line 34:		Line 34:
	# '''Support'''. I think Fred will prove good at this job based on my own experiences with him. [[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 05:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)		# '''Support'''. I think Fred will prove good at this job based on my own experiences with him. [[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 05:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

	===Oppose===		=== Oppose ===

	===Neutral===		=== Neutral ===
	# '''Neutral.''' Meh. [[User:Fitzgerald Lee\|Fitzgerald Lee]] ([[User talk:Fitzgerald Lee\|talk]])		# '''Neutral.''' Meh. [[User:Fitzgerald Lee\|Fitzgerald Lee]] ([[User talk:Fitzgerald Lee\|talk]])

	===Comments===		=== Comments ===
	The one and only problem I see so far is that if we don't have enough bureaucrats, Fred could be overloaded- especially since he seems to be so busy as is- so we need to nominate at least one to two more bureaucrats. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 05:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)		The one and only problem I see so far is that if we don't have enough bureaucrats, Fred could be overloaded- especially since he seems to be so busy as is- so we need to nominate at least one to two more bureaucrats. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 05:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Line 73:		Line 73:

	: Bureaucrats are important but the job itself is not very demanding. For reference, the whole of English Wikipedia only has 16 active bureaucrats currently (see [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Current_bureaucrats]]). – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 18:48, 28 October 2025 (UTC)		: Bureaucrats are important but the job itself is not very demanding. For reference, the whole of English Wikipedia only has 16 active bureaucrats currently (see [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Current_bureaucrats]]). – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 18:48, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

			=== Result ===
			[[User: Fredg999\|Fredg999]] is elected a bureaucrat following overwhelmingly positive community reactions. —[[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 08:16, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

TallKite: /* Fredg999 */ voting period

2025-10-29T03:14:36Z

Fredg999: voting period

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:14, 29 October 2025
Line 7:		Line 7:
	You can also add comments or questions for the candidate under 'comments'.		You can also add comments or questions for the candidate under 'comments'.

	==Fredg999==		==Fredg999 for bureaucrat (Oct 2025)==

			Voting is open for 1 week after the 3rd vote has been cast. Voting is now closed.

			Please place any future elections above this one, so that the most recent ones are always on top.

	===Nomination===		===Nomination===

Sintel: /* Fredg999 */

2025-10-28T18:48:26Z

Fredg999

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:48, 28 October 2025
Line 67:		Line 67:

	:: In addition, I would think that Ganaram Inukshuk and Sintel would make good admins. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 02:06, 28 October 2025 (UTC)		:: In addition, I would think that Ganaram Inukshuk and Sintel would make good admins. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 02:06, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

			: Bureaucrats are important but the job itself is not very demanding. For reference, the whole of English Wikipedia only has 16 active bureaucrats currently (see [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Current_bureaucrats]]). – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 18:48, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

BudjarnLambeth at 02:18, 28 October 2025

2025-10-28T02:18:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:18, 28 October 2025
Line 54:		Line 54:
	* Bcmills		* Bcmills
	* Sintel		* Sintel
	* Nick Vuci
	* Gordon Wery		* Gordon Wery
	* Xenoindex		* Xenoindex
Line 67:		Line 66:
	:: For some reason, I thought that Admin was above Bureaucrat, but it seems I was mistaken. Anyhow, of that list you propose, the two that really come to mind are Xenoindex and Bcmills. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 01:59, 28 October 2025 (UTC)		:: For some reason, I thought that Admin was above Bureaucrat, but it seems I was mistaken. Anyhow, of that list you propose, the two that really come to mind are Xenoindex and Bcmills. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 01:59, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

	:: In addition, I would think that Ganaram Inukshuk and Sintel would make good admins. I do disagree with the idea of Nick Vuci as an admin at least for now- I'll have to elaborate more on the problems in DMs on Discord seeing as I'm not totally comfortable clogging up this page with the details of that matter. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 02:06, 28 October 2025 (UTC)		:: In addition, I would think that Ganaram Inukshuk and Sintel would make good admins. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 02:06, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Aura at 02:06, 28 October 2025

2025-10-28T02:06:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:06, 28 October 2025
Line 66:		Line 66:

	:: For some reason, I thought that Admin was above Bureaucrat, but it seems I was mistaken. Anyhow, of that list you propose, the two that really come to mind are Xenoindex and Bcmills. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 01:59, 28 October 2025 (UTC)		:: For some reason, I thought that Admin was above Bureaucrat, but it seems I was mistaken. Anyhow, of that list you propose, the two that really come to mind are Xenoindex and Bcmills. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 01:59, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

			:: In addition, I would think that Ganaram Inukshuk and Sintel would make good admins. I do disagree with the idea of Nick Vuci as an admin at least for now- I'll have to elaborate more on the problems in DMs on Discord seeing as I'm not totally comfortable clogging up this page with the details of that matter. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 02:06, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Aura at 01:59, 28 October 2025

2025-10-28T01:59:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:59, 28 October 2025
Line 64:		Line 64:

	: --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 01:08, 28 October 2025 (UTC)		: --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 01:08, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

			:: For some reason, I thought that Admin was above Bureaucrat, but it seems I was mistaken. Anyhow, of that list you propose, the two that really come to mind are Xenoindex and Bcmills. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 01:59, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

BudjarnLambeth: /* Comments */

2025-10-28T01:17:34Z

Comments

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:17, 28 October 2025
Line 57:		Line 57:
	* Gordon Wery		* Gordon Wery
	* Xenoindex		* Xenoindex
			: <small>''(alphabetical order by surname)''</small>

	: would be good choices (only if they themselves were okay with being nominated though of course; we'd need to ask them individually first).		: would be good choices (only if they themselves were okay with being nominated though of course; we'd need to ask them individually first).

BudjarnLambeth: /* Comments */

2025-10-28T01:12:37Z

Comments

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:12, 28 October 2025
Line 57:		Line 57:
	* Gordon Wery		* Gordon Wery
	* Xenoindex		* Xenoindex
	would be good choices (only if they themselves were okay with being nominated though of course; we'd need to ask them individually first).		: would be good choices (only if they themselves were okay with being nominated though of course; we'd need to ask them individually first).

	: Are there any of those suggestions you agree or disagree with? Any other names you think it might be a good idea to nominate?		: Are there any of those suggestions you agree or disagree with? Any other names you think it might be a good idea to nominate?

	: --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 01:08, 28 October 2025 (UTC)		: --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 01:08, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

BudjarnLambeth: /* Comments */

2025-10-28T01:12:23Z

Comments

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:12, 28 October 2025
Line 48:		Line 48:
	: Here is the list of current admins: [[Xenharmonic Wiki:Administrators#Current administrators]]. On that list, aside from Fred, I don't see anyone who is both active enough and non-controversial enough to be an ideal candidate for bureaucrat.		: Here is the list of current admins: [[Xenharmonic Wiki:Administrators#Current administrators]]. On that list, aside from Fred, I don't see anyone who is both active enough and non-controversial enough to be an ideal candidate for bureaucrat.

	: As such, I think it might make some sense to nominate more new admins; and maybe a year or two down the line if things are going well, they might be nominated as full bureaucrats. I think that Ganaram Inukshuk, Sintel ~~and/or~~ Xenoindex would be good choices (only if they themselves were okay with being nominated though of course; we'd need to ask them individually first).		: As such, I think it might make some sense to nominate more new admins; and maybe a year or two down the line if things are going well, they might be nominated as full bureaucrats.

			: I think that any of:
			* Ganaram Inukshuk
			* Bcmills
			* Sintel
			* Nick Vuci
			* Gordon Wery
			* Xenoindex
			would be good choices (only if they themselves were okay with being nominated though of course; we'd need to ask them individually first).

	: Are there any of those suggestions you agree or disagree with? Any other names you think it might be a good idea to nominate?		: Are there any of those suggestions you agree or disagree with? Any other names you think it might be a good idea to nominate?

	: --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 01:08, 28 October 2025 (UTC)		: --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 01:08, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

BudjarnLambeth: /* Comments */ reply

2025-10-28T01:08:16Z

Comments: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:08, 28 October 2025
Line 37:		Line 37:
	===Comments===		===Comments===
	The one and only problem I see so far is that if we don't have enough bureaucrats, Fred could be overloaded- especially since he seems to be so busy as is- so we need to nominate at least one to two more bureaucrats. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 05:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)		The one and only problem I see so far is that if we don't have enough bureaucrats, Fred could be overloaded- especially since he seems to be so busy as is- so we need to nominate at least one to two more bureaucrats. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 05:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

			: Hi Aura,

			: This is a fair concern; I think promoting Fred is the best first step for addressing it.

			: Once Fred is promoted, there will be 3 active bureaucrats instead of 2: Tyler, FloraC and Fred.

			: If someone else were to become a bureaucrat, it would probably make sense for them to be a regular admin for a year or so first (as was the case with Flora and Fred).

			: Here is the list of current admins: [[Xenharmonic Wiki:Administrators#Current administrators]]. On that list, aside from Fred, I don't see anyone who is both active enough and non-controversial enough to be an ideal candidate for bureaucrat.

			: As such, I think it might make some sense to nominate more new admins; and maybe a year or two down the line if things are going well, they might be nominated as full bureaucrats. I think that Ganaram Inukshuk, Sintel and/or Xenoindex would be good choices (only if they themselves were okay with being nominated though of course; we'd need to ask them individually first).

			: Are there any of those suggestions you agree or disagree with? Any other names you think it might be a good idea to nominate?

			: --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 01:08, 28 October 2025 (UTC)