<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=User_talk%3ASevish%2FQuasi-periodic_golden_ratio_based_scales</id>
	<title>User talk:Sevish/Quasi-periodic golden ratio based scales - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=User_talk%3ASevish%2FQuasi-periodic_golden_ratio_based_scales"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Sevish/Quasi-periodic_golden_ratio_based_scales&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-07-06T16:23:43Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Sevish/Quasi-periodic_golden_ratio_based_scales&amp;diff=179463&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Arseniiv: feedback</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Sevish/Quasi-periodic_golden_ratio_based_scales&amp;diff=179463&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2025-02-04T13:58:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;feedback&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Nice approach! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These scales look like a great family of examples of a bit more general [[User:Arseniiv/Infinite_MOS|“infinite MOS scale”]] idea I came up with, some time ago. (And I should probably edit the page someday... Not the best writing, probably more examples would be better, but at least the sole example I used is the same golden pattern your scales have when delimited enough times, as you wrote.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In that general setting, there’s a lot of freedom (sizes of both steps and then the overall limiting density of the L steps compared to s steps), so pointing out reasonable options can be hard, and your scale family is a neat point of interest to use and look around, and with a good reminder that one can tune to specific intervals larger than a scale step easily enough. I also haven’t considered building a scale top to bottom, for some reason, despite it’s indeed easy because we’re always concerned with a finite fragment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About corrections: it seems the generation algorithm is solid, to me, in regard to the claims.  --[[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 13:58, 4 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Arseniiv</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>