<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=User%3AVectorGraphics%2FXenharmonic_gaslighting</id>
	<title>User:VectorGraphics/Xenharmonic gaslighting - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=User%3AVectorGraphics%2FXenharmonic_gaslighting"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=User:VectorGraphics/Xenharmonic_gaslighting&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-07-14T14:49:16Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=User:VectorGraphics/Xenharmonic_gaslighting&amp;diff=186584&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>VectorGraphics: Created page with &quot;There is an important characteristic of my approach to xenharmonic composition, theory, notation, etc, that defines a lot of my opinions:  &#039;&#039;&#039;When I&#039;m working in another syste...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=User:VectorGraphics/Xenharmonic_gaslighting&amp;diff=186584&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2025-03-17T10:19:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;There is an important characteristic of my approach to xenharmonic composition, theory, notation, etc, that defines a lot of my opinions:  &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;When I&amp;#039;m working in another syste...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;There is an important characteristic of my approach to xenharmonic composition, theory, notation, etc, that defines a lot of my opinions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;When I&amp;#039;m working in another system, diatonic/12edo/whatever part of Western convention I&amp;#039;m deviating from does not exist, and has never existed.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Essentially, each theory system essentially exists in its own little universe where no other theory system exists or is the standard. This is the logic behind:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Using quasi-diatonic MOS notation: it&amp;#039;s not ambiguous with diatonic because diatonic does not exist.&lt;br /&gt;
** Calling a large 2-mosstep a &amp;quot;major third&amp;quot; regardless of the actual interval size.&lt;br /&gt;
* Using # to raise pitch in 16edo: the difference between the minor and major third is 9 fifths; it&amp;#039;s always been.&lt;br /&gt;
** Calling an interval in the vicinity of 400c in size a &amp;quot;major third&amp;quot; regardless of the actual scale pattern.&lt;br /&gt;
* Considering 720c in 15edo or even 20edo to be a 3/2 interval: it&amp;#039;s close enough to 3/2 to fool an entire musical tradition into believing that it is, similarly to 400c and 5/4 IRL. &lt;br /&gt;
* Insisting that diamond-mos notation be used for diatonic: what even is this about &amp;quot;diatonic is the standard&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;we need to be backwards compatible&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;
* Insisting on using a non-MOS notation for 15edo: in what universe is having only 2 varieties of intervals significant? I &amp;lt;3 wolf fifths&lt;br /&gt;
* Insisting on calling said non-MOS (zarlino) a kind of &amp;quot;diatonic&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And probably other things I&amp;#039;ll get around to remembering eventually.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>VectorGraphics</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>