<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=User%3ACellularAutomaton%2FEDO_impressions</id>
	<title>User:CellularAutomaton/EDO impressions - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=User%3ACellularAutomaton%2FEDO_impressions"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=User:CellularAutomaton/EDO_impressions&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-06-29T05:28:44Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=User:CellularAutomaton/EDO_impressions&amp;diff=162752&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>CellularAutomaton: Created page with &quot;1-4: uninteresting  5: very tangy, good structure. 5-form is important, but by nature 5edo loses most of the interesting properties of various 5-form scales  6: not bad actual...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=User:CellularAutomaton/EDO_impressions&amp;diff=162752&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2024-10-28T14:30:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;1-4: uninteresting  5: very tangy, good structure. 5-form is important, but by nature 5edo loses most of the interesting properties of various 5-form scales  6: not bad actual...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;1-4: uninteresting&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5: very tangy, good structure. 5-form is important, but by nature 5edo loses most of the interesting properties of various 5-form scales&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6: not bad actually, i like that it&amp;#039;s attested in a lot of music&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7: similar situation to 5, it&amp;#039;s just dusty and rounded instead of spiky and sour.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8: there&amp;#039;s cool stuff in 8-form but 8edo is just cluttered 6edo lowkey&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9: never found reason to use this edo, never heard anything i liked in it&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10: also better as a scale form than an edo, for me. but i know very little about 10edo actually&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
11: cold, clear, alien&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12: actually really good. there&amp;#039;s basically no world where the smallest edo to have a consonant 3/2 isn&amp;#039;t important to some degree&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
13: dark, macabre&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
14: really cool i just wish 3/2 was better. very significant for having sin, neu &amp;amp; saj 3rds, i forget whether it&amp;#039;s literally the first such edo but i like it for that reason, and because i&amp;#039;ve heard good music in it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
15: seems interesting but i haven&amp;#039;t heard much in it&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
17: my beloveddd. big strong bright 3/2s, very cheerful quintal chords, a very suave sin7, lovely neu2nds, flavorful tritones. a well behaved glimpse of 2.3.7.11.13, and for JI sticklers we still have a nice 2.3.13.23&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
19: ehhh. in my book it&amp;#039;s never worth sacrificing 3/2 for 5/4. 3/2 is just so fundamental and 5-limit stuff is really optional, you can take it or leave it&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
22: the diatonic is like, so terrible, and the 3/2 is severely sharp, but i think there is interesting stuff in here, just haven&amp;#039;t tried it yet. you&amp;#039;ll notice that i&amp;#039;m being harsher on larger edos for a lack of JI, this is because i don&amp;#039;t see much of a point in using like 16+ notes and having to fight tooth and nail for consonance as if you were in a much smaller edo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
24: you&amp;#039;re fighting against just returning to 12 at every turn and for most of the new sounds you would be better served by 17 or 19&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
26: much more charming than i would expect. i haven&amp;#039;t done tons with it but i quite like it&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
29: probably next on my list to get familiar with once i&amp;#039;m comfortable with 17. seems nice&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
31: undeniably cool but the 3/2 is not awesome for me, i prefer a sharp 3/2 over flat&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
34: pretty nice, but getting big enough that you have to use a subset&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
41: beyond this point you&amp;#039;re better off using free pitch or ji, imo. edos higher than this are theoretical objects&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>CellularAutomaton</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>