Template talk:Primes in edo fs - Revision history

Fredg999 at 16:18, 19 July 2021

2021-07-19T16:18:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:18, 19 July 2021
Line 6:		Line 6:

	: The postfix <code>_fs</code> stands for ''fifthspan''. My goal is to add fifthspans to the first template (maybe as an option, maybe automatically added when it's unique). There are also a few things to adjust in formatting, so the hyphen in negative values will be replaced by the minus sign. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 06:11, 19 July 2021 (UTC)		: The postfix <code>_fs</code> stands for ''fifthspan''. My goal is to add fifthspans to the first template (maybe as an option, maybe automatically added when it's unique). There are also a few things to adjust in formatting, so the hyphen in negative values will be replaced by the minus sign. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 06:11, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

			:: That's what I guessed for <code>_fs</code>. Automatic fifthspan for single-ring edos would be fantastic, but no pressure! In the meanwhile, I'll use the regular template when needed, but I won't replace the tables that include the fifthspans for now. [[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 16:18, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Xenwolf: /* Differences with Template:Primes in edo */ re

2021-07-19T06:11:29Z

Differences with Template:Primes in edo: re

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:11, 19 July 2021
Line 4:		Line 4:

	As a side note, I notice a few differences between the templates; maybe the first one was updated after the fork? Anyway, I wish the second was the same as the first but with the extra line for fifthspan. I guess it doesn't really matter if that is changed later, since the tables are dynamically generated by the module anyway, but I could be mistaken about how modules work. [[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 15:53, 18 July 2021 (UTC)		As a side note, I notice a few differences between the templates; maybe the first one was updated after the fork? Anyway, I wish the second was the same as the first but with the extra line for fifthspan. I guess it doesn't really matter if that is changed later, since the tables are dynamically generated by the module anyway, but I could be mistaken about how modules work. [[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 15:53, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

			: The postfix <code>_fs</code> stands for ''fifthspan''. My goal is to add fifthspans to the first template (maybe as an option, maybe automatically added when it's unique). There are also a few things to adjust in formatting, so the hyphen in negative values will be replaced by the minus sign. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 06:11, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Fredg999: /* Differences with Template:Primes in edo */ new section

2021-07-18T15:53:12Z

Differences with Template:Primes in edo: new section

New page

== Differences with [[Template:Primes in edo]] ==

I noticed that the pages about specific edos have inconsistent prime approximation tables. Some of them are still done by hand, while others use [[Template:Primes_in_edo]]. It seems that [[Template:Primes_in_edo_fs]] was created as a fork of that first template, but it is only used on [[User:Xenwolf/Fifthspan]] (probably for demonstration?). If I were to uniformize the tables, I'd be tempted to use the first template for multi-ring edos and the second for single-ring edos. Would that make sense?

As a side note, I notice a few differences between the templates; maybe the first one was updated after the fork? Anyway, I wish the second was the same as the first but with the extra line for fifthspan. I guess it doesn't really matter if that is changed later, since the tables are dynamically generated by the module anyway, but I could be mistaken about how modules work. [[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 15:53, 18 July 2021 (UTC)