Template talk:Infobox regtemp - Revision history

FloraC: Status update

2025-12-06T14:10:13Z

Status update

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:10, 6 December 2025
Line 6:		Line 6:
	: What would be chosen as the equave? -- [[User:VectorGraphics\|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics\|talk]]) 00:57, 28 June 2025 (UTC)		: What would be chosen as the equave? -- [[User:VectorGraphics\|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics\|talk]]) 00:57, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

	:: Imo these should simply be ''ET join'' and always use wart notation whenever the formal equave is a prime harmonic e.g. mintaka is b5 & b17 (''not'' *5 & 17). [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 10:33, 28 June 2025 (UTC)		:: Imo these should simply be ''ET join'' and always use wart notation whenever the formal equave is a prime harmonic e.g. mintaka is b5 & b17 (''not'' *5 & 17). —[[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 10:33, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

			:: Resolved. —[[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 14:10, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

	== Banish "reduced mappings" to the shadow realm ==		== Banish "reduced mappings" to the shadow realm ==
Line 12:		Line 14:
	-- [[User:VectorGraphics\|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics\|talk]]) 06:53, 30 July 2025 (UTC)		-- [[User:VectorGraphics\|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics\|talk]]) 06:53, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

	: Fyi my initial version of the ''Reduced mapping'' article was perfectly readable. Then hkm changed it to something that no one understands. Guess it's time to review it. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 08:06, 30 July 2025 (UTC)		: Fyi my initial version of the ''Reduced mapping'' article was perfectly readable. Then hkm changed it to something that no one understands. Guess it's time to review it. —[[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 08:06, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

	: I don't think the reduced mapping is useful at all, and even if it was it doesn't have a wide enough support to justify it being in the infobox. – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 10:56, 30 July 2025 (UTC)		: I don't think the reduced mapping is useful at all, and even if it was it doesn't have a wide enough support to justify it being in the infobox. – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 10:56, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Line 25:		Line 27:
	: I should add the definition for this number is the smallest mos that is greater than the ''q''-odd-limit Graham complexity for the temp.		: I should add the definition for this number is the smallest mos that is greater than the ''q''-odd-limit Graham complexity for the temp.

	: [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 11:33, 21 October 2025 (UTC)		: —[[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 11:33, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

	== Ploidacot ==		== Ploidacot ==
Line 31:		Line 33:
	: Also, acot doesn't work properly. In the infobox for [[blackwood]], I made the first zero as <code><nowiki><small><big>0</big></small></nowiki></code>, as putting a zero at the start creates an error. I believe the infobox read the mapping as "5; 1 0" rather than "5; 0 1 0", and I overrid the ploidacot. I tried to re-add the infobox to [[bixby]] with the small big zero trick, but this time it doesn't work, as it reads the mapping as "1", which may be the reason there's an error. In general, the mapping code need to be reworked.--[[User:Overthink\|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink\|talk]]) 21:50, 23 October 2025 (UTC)		: Also, acot doesn't work properly. In the infobox for [[blackwood]], I made the first zero as <code><nowiki><small><big>0</big></small></nowiki></code>, as putting a zero at the start creates an error. I believe the infobox read the mapping as "5; 1 0" rather than "5; 0 1 0", and I overrid the ploidacot. I tried to re-add the infobox to [[bixby]] with the small big zero trick, but this time it doesn't work, as it reads the mapping as "1", which may be the reason there's an error. In general, the mapping code need to be reworked.--[[User:Overthink\|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink\|talk]]) 21:50, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
	: When adding the infobox to [[negri]], I found the ploidacot appears as tetracot, but it should be omega-tetracot.--[[User:Overthink\|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink\|talk]]) 17:49, 11 November 2025 (UTC)		: When adding the infobox to [[negri]], I found the ploidacot appears as tetracot, but it should be omega-tetracot.--[[User:Overthink\|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink\|talk]]) 17:49, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

			:: Resolved. —[[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 14:10, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

	== A variety of issues ==		== A variety of issues ==
			As mentioned in the previous section, when adding the infobox to [[negri]], I found the ploidacot appears as tetracot, but it should be omega-tetracot. Also, when I tried to use 15/8 as the generator, after adding the generator size, the infobox broke completely. It should also properly link EDOs using alternate vals in the EDO join, which doesn't work as seen in [[archon]], and may be a problem in other temperaments like [[squares]] (14c&17c) as well, though 31&45 is also plausible. Overall, there are a lot of bugs.--[[User:Overthink\|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink\|talk]]) 17:54, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

	As mentioned in the previous section, when adding the infobox to [[negri]], I found the ploidacot appears as tetracot, but it should be omega-tetracot. Also, when I tried to use 15/8 as the generator, after adding the generator size, the infobox broke completely. It should also properly link EDOs using alternate vals in the EDO join, which doesn't work as seen in [[archon]], and may be a problem in other temperaments like [[squares]] (14c&17c) as well, though 31&45 is also plausible. Overall, there are a lot of bugs.--[[User:~~Overthink~~\|~~Overthink~~]] ([[User talk:~~Overthink~~\|talk]]) 17:54, ~~11 November~~ 2025 (UTC)		: Resolved. —[[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 14:10, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Overthink: /* A variety of issues */ new section

2025-11-11T17:54:02Z

A variety of issues: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:54, 11 November 2025
Line 31:		Line 31:
	: Also, acot doesn't work properly. In the infobox for [[blackwood]], I made the first zero as <code><nowiki><small><big>0</big></small></nowiki></code>, as putting a zero at the start creates an error. I believe the infobox read the mapping as "5; 1 0" rather than "5; 0 1 0", and I overrid the ploidacot. I tried to re-add the infobox to [[bixby]] with the small big zero trick, but this time it doesn't work, as it reads the mapping as "1", which may be the reason there's an error. In general, the mapping code need to be reworked.--[[User:Overthink\|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink\|talk]]) 21:50, 23 October 2025 (UTC)		: Also, acot doesn't work properly. In the infobox for [[blackwood]], I made the first zero as <code><nowiki><small><big>0</big></small></nowiki></code>, as putting a zero at the start creates an error. I believe the infobox read the mapping as "5; 1 0" rather than "5; 0 1 0", and I overrid the ploidacot. I tried to re-add the infobox to [[bixby]] with the small big zero trick, but this time it doesn't work, as it reads the mapping as "1", which may be the reason there's an error. In general, the mapping code need to be reworked.--[[User:Overthink\|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink\|talk]]) 21:50, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
	: When adding the infobox to [[negri]], I found the ploidacot appears as tetracot, but it should be omega-tetracot.--[[User:Overthink\|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink\|talk]]) 17:49, 11 November 2025 (UTC)		: When adding the infobox to [[negri]], I found the ploidacot appears as tetracot, but it should be omega-tetracot.--[[User:Overthink\|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink\|talk]]) 17:49, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

			== A variety of issues ==

			As mentioned in the previous section, when adding the infobox to [[negri]], I found the ploidacot appears as tetracot, but it should be omega-tetracot. Also, when I tried to use 15/8 as the generator, after adding the generator size, the infobox broke completely. It should also properly link EDOs using alternate vals in the EDO join, which doesn't work as seen in [[archon]], and may be a problem in other temperaments like [[squares]] (14c&17c) as well, though 31&45 is also plausible. Overall, there are a lot of bugs.--[[User:Overthink\|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink\|talk]]) 17:54, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Overthink: /* Ploidacot */ Added another example of issue

2025-11-11T17:49:51Z

Ploidacot: Added another example of issue

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:49, 11 November 2025
Line 30:		Line 30:
	The correct ploidacot for decimal is diploid dicot. This template gives diploid alpha-dicot. Something to do with the algorithm in the module. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 08:57, 23 October 2025 (UTC)		The correct ploidacot for decimal is diploid dicot. This template gives diploid alpha-dicot. Something to do with the algorithm in the module. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 08:57, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
	: Also, acot doesn't work properly. In the infobox for [[blackwood]], I made the first zero as <code><nowiki><small><big>0</big></small></nowiki></code>, as putting a zero at the start creates an error. I believe the infobox read the mapping as "5; 1 0" rather than "5; 0 1 0", and I overrid the ploidacot. I tried to re-add the infobox to [[bixby]] with the small big zero trick, but this time it doesn't work, as it reads the mapping as "1", which may be the reason there's an error. In general, the mapping code need to be reworked.--[[User:Overthink\|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink\|talk]]) 21:50, 23 October 2025 (UTC)		: Also, acot doesn't work properly. In the infobox for [[blackwood]], I made the first zero as <code><nowiki><small><big>0</big></small></nowiki></code>, as putting a zero at the start creates an error. I believe the infobox read the mapping as "5; 1 0" rather than "5; 0 1 0", and I overrid the ploidacot. I tried to re-add the infobox to [[bixby]] with the small big zero trick, but this time it doesn't work, as it reads the mapping as "1", which may be the reason there's an error. In general, the mapping code need to be reworked.--[[User:Overthink\|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink\|talk]]) 21:50, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
			: When adding the infobox to [[negri]], I found the ploidacot appears as tetracot, but it should be omega-tetracot.--[[User:Overthink\|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink\|talk]]) 17:49, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Overthink: /* Ploidacot */

2025-10-23T21:50:56Z

Ploidacot

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:50, 23 October 2025
Line 29:		Line 29:
	== Ploidacot ==		== Ploidacot ==
	The correct ploidacot for decimal is diploid dicot. This template gives diploid alpha-dicot. Something to do with the algorithm in the module. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 08:57, 23 October 2025 (UTC)		The correct ploidacot for decimal is diploid dicot. This template gives diploid alpha-dicot. Something to do with the algorithm in the module. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 08:57, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
			: Also, acot doesn't work properly. In the infobox for [[blackwood]], I made the first zero as <code><nowiki><small><big>0</big></small></nowiki></code>, as putting a zero at the start creates an error. I believe the infobox read the mapping as "5; 1 0" rather than "5; 0 1 0", and I overrid the ploidacot. I tried to re-add the infobox to [[bixby]] with the small big zero trick, but this time it doesn't work, as it reads the mapping as "1", which may be the reason there's an error. In general, the mapping code need to be reworked.--[[User:Overthink\|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink\|talk]]) 21:50, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

FloraC at 08:57, 23 October 2025

2025-10-23T08:57:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:57, 23 October 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Non-octave stuff ==		== Non-octave stuff ==

	This is a bit of a nit, but would be nice if the box said 'edt join' instead 'edo join' for tritave temperaments (and similarly for other equaves).		This is a bit of a nit, but would be nice if the box said 'edt join' instead 'edo join' for tritave temperaments (and similarly for other equaves).
	See e.g. [[Mintaka]].		See e.g. [[Mintaka]].
Line 20:		Line 19:

	== Target scale size ==		== Target scale size ==

	Is there an exact convention for what this should be? Possible answers include the smallest MOS with all odd harmonics in the limit accessible from the same root, and the smallest MOS with all intervals in the odd limit accessible from the same root. Most pages use the latter, but I prefer the former, as the latter sometimes gives overly large scales. For example, in [[miracle]] temperament, the minimum size of a scale to reach both [[11/10]] and [[20/11]] from the same root is 45, and the smallest MOS of at least that size is 72, at which point you might as well use all of 72edo. I'll change some pages to use the former; feel free to revert if you want.--[[User:Overthink\|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink\|talk]]) 04:38, 19 October 2025 (UTC)		Is there an exact convention for what this should be? Possible answers include the smallest MOS with all odd harmonics in the limit accessible from the same root, and the smallest MOS with all intervals in the odd limit accessible from the same root. Most pages use the latter, but I prefer the former, as the latter sometimes gives overly large scales. For example, in [[miracle]] temperament, the minimum size of a scale to reach both [[11/10]] and [[20/11]] from the same root is 45, and the smallest MOS of at least that size is 72, at which point you might as well use all of 72edo. I'll change some pages to use the former; feel free to revert if you want.--[[User:Overthink\|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink\|talk]]) 04:38, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

Line 28:		Line 26:

	: [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 11:33, 21 October 2025 (UTC)		: [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 11:33, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

			== Ploidacot ==
			The correct ploidacot for decimal is diploid dicot. This template gives diploid alpha-dicot. Something to do with the algorithm in the module. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 08:57, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

FloraC: Re

2025-10-21T11:33:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:33, 21 October 2025
Line 22:		Line 22:

	Is there an exact convention for what this should be? Possible answers include the smallest MOS with all odd harmonics in the limit accessible from the same root, and the smallest MOS with all intervals in the odd limit accessible from the same root. Most pages use the latter, but I prefer the former, as the latter sometimes gives overly large scales. For example, in [[miracle]] temperament, the minimum size of a scale to reach both [[11/10]] and [[20/11]] from the same root is 45, and the smallest MOS of at least that size is 72, at which point you might as well use all of 72edo. I'll change some pages to use the former; feel free to revert if you want.--[[User:Overthink\|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink\|talk]]) 04:38, 19 October 2025 (UTC)		Is there an exact convention for what this should be? Possible answers include the smallest MOS with all odd harmonics in the limit accessible from the same root, and the smallest MOS with all intervals in the odd limit accessible from the same root. Most pages use the latter, but I prefer the former, as the latter sometimes gives overly large scales. For example, in [[miracle]] temperament, the minimum size of a scale to reach both [[11/10]] and [[20/11]] from the same root is 45, and the smallest MOS of at least that size is 72, at which point you might as well use all of 72edo. I'll change some pages to use the former; feel free to revert if you want.--[[User:Overthink\|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink\|talk]]) 04:38, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

			: I think the former makes more sense too since we're talking about ''scales'', so like diatonic in meantone, you can reach the other tonality thru rotation.

			: I should add the definition for this number is the smallest mos that is greater than the ''q''-odd-limit Graham complexity for the temp.

			: [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 11:33, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Overthink: /* Target scale size */ new section

2025-10-19T04:38:47Z

Target scale size: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:38, 19 October 2025
Line 18:		Line 18:

	: I find the reduced mapping to be very useful. --[[User:TallKite\|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite\|talk]]) 00:02, 31 July 2025 (UTC)		: I find the reduced mapping to be very useful. --[[User:TallKite\|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite\|talk]]) 00:02, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

			== Target scale size ==

			Is there an exact convention for what this should be? Possible answers include the smallest MOS with all odd harmonics in the limit accessible from the same root, and the smallest MOS with all intervals in the odd limit accessible from the same root. Most pages use the latter, but I prefer the former, as the latter sometimes gives overly large scales. For example, in [[miracle]] temperament, the minimum size of a scale to reach both [[11/10]] and [[20/11]] from the same root is 45, and the smallest MOS of at least that size is 72, at which point you might as well use all of 72edo. I'll change some pages to use the former; feel free to revert if you want.--[[User:Overthink\|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink\|talk]]) 04:38, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

TallKite at 00:02, 31 July 2025

2025-07-31T00:02:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:02, 31 July 2025
Line 16:		Line 16:

	: I don't think the reduced mapping is useful at all, and even if it was it doesn't have a wide enough support to justify it being in the infobox. – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 10:56, 30 July 2025 (UTC)		: I don't think the reduced mapping is useful at all, and even if it was it doesn't have a wide enough support to justify it being in the infobox. – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 10:56, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

			: I find the reduced mapping to be very useful. --[[User:TallKite\|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite\|talk]]) 00:02, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Sintel at 10:56, 30 July 2025

2025-07-30T10:56:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:56, 30 July 2025
Line 14:		Line 14:

	: Fyi my initial version of the ''Reduced mapping'' article was perfectly readable. Then hkm changed it to something that no one understands. Guess it's time to review it. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 08:06, 30 July 2025 (UTC)		: Fyi my initial version of the ''Reduced mapping'' article was perfectly readable. Then hkm changed it to something that no one understands. Guess it's time to review it. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 08:06, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

			: I don't think the reduced mapping is useful at all, and even if it was it doesn't have a wide enough support to justify it being in the infobox. – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 10:56, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

FloraC: /* Banish "reduced mappings" to the shadow realm */ re

2025-07-30T08:06:01Z

Banish "reduced mappings" to the shadow realm: re

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:06, 30 July 2025
Line 10:		Line 10:

	== Banish "reduced mappings" to the shadow realm ==		== Banish "reduced mappings" to the shadow realm ==

	Make this infobox not completely break if you don't supply the precise "reduced mapping" format it wants, because I can't understand the [[Reduced mapping]] page and am not figuring allat out and it's probably the main thing that's been putting me off adding these infoboxes.		Make this infobox not completely break if you don't supply the precise "reduced mapping" format it wants, because I can't understand the [[Reduced mapping]] page and am not figuring allat out and it's probably the main thing that's been putting me off adding these infoboxes.
	-- [[User:VectorGraphics\|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics\|talk]]) 06:53, 30 July 2025 (UTC)		-- [[User:VectorGraphics\|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics\|talk]]) 06:53, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

			: Fyi my initial version of the ''Reduced mapping'' article was perfectly readable. Then hkm changed it to something that no one understands. Guess it's time to review it. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 08:06, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:10, 6 December 2025
Line 6:		Line 6:
	: What would be chosen as the equave? -- [[User:VectorGraphics\|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics\|talk]]) 00:57, 28 June 2025 (UTC)		: What would be chosen as the equave? -- [[User:VectorGraphics\|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics\|talk]]) 00:57, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

	:: Imo these should simply be ''ET join'' and always use wart notation whenever the formal equave is a prime harmonic e.g. mintaka is b5 & b17 (''not'' *5 & 17). [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 10:33, 28 June 2025 (UTC)		:: Imo these should simply be ''ET join'' and always use wart notation whenever the formal equave is a prime harmonic e.g. mintaka is b5 & b17 (''not'' *5 & 17). —[[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 10:33, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

			:: Resolved. —[[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 14:10, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

	== Banish "reduced mappings" to the shadow realm ==		== Banish "reduced mappings" to the shadow realm ==
Line 12:		Line 14:
	-- [[User:VectorGraphics\|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics\|talk]]) 06:53, 30 July 2025 (UTC)		-- [[User:VectorGraphics\|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics\|talk]]) 06:53, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

	: Fyi my initial version of the ''Reduced mapping'' article was perfectly readable. Then hkm changed it to something that no one understands. Guess it's time to review it. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 08:06, 30 July 2025 (UTC)		: Fyi my initial version of the ''Reduced mapping'' article was perfectly readable. Then hkm changed it to something that no one understands. Guess it's time to review it. —[[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 08:06, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

	: I don't think the reduced mapping is useful at all, and even if it was it doesn't have a wide enough support to justify it being in the infobox. – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 10:56, 30 July 2025 (UTC)		: I don't think the reduced mapping is useful at all, and even if it was it doesn't have a wide enough support to justify it being in the infobox. – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 10:56, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Line 25:		Line 27:
	: I should add the definition for this number is the smallest mos that is greater than the ''q''-odd-limit Graham complexity for the temp.		: I should add the definition for this number is the smallest mos that is greater than the ''q''-odd-limit Graham complexity for the temp.

	: [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 11:33, 21 October 2025 (UTC)		: —[[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 11:33, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

	== Ploidacot ==		== Ploidacot ==
Line 31:		Line 33:
	: Also, acot doesn't work properly. In the infobox for [[blackwood]], I made the first zero as <code><nowiki><small><big>0</big></small></nowiki></code>, as putting a zero at the start creates an error. I believe the infobox read the mapping as "5; 1 0" rather than "5; 0 1 0", and I overrid the ploidacot. I tried to re-add the infobox to [[bixby]] with the small big zero trick, but this time it doesn't work, as it reads the mapping as "1", which may be the reason there's an error. In general, the mapping code need to be reworked.--[[User:Overthink\|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink\|talk]]) 21:50, 23 October 2025 (UTC)		: Also, acot doesn't work properly. In the infobox for [[blackwood]], I made the first zero as <code><nowiki><small><big>0</big></small></nowiki></code>, as putting a zero at the start creates an error. I believe the infobox read the mapping as "5; 1 0" rather than "5; 0 1 0", and I overrid the ploidacot. I tried to re-add the infobox to [[bixby]] with the small big zero trick, but this time it doesn't work, as it reads the mapping as "1", which may be the reason there's an error. In general, the mapping code need to be reworked.--[[User:Overthink\|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink\|talk]]) 21:50, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
	: When adding the infobox to [[negri]], I found the ploidacot appears as tetracot, but it should be omega-tetracot.--[[User:Overthink\|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink\|talk]]) 17:49, 11 November 2025 (UTC)		: When adding the infobox to [[negri]], I found the ploidacot appears as tetracot, but it should be omega-tetracot.--[[User:Overthink\|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink\|talk]]) 17:49, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

			:: Resolved. —[[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 14:10, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

	== A variety of issues ==		== A variety of issues ==
			As mentioned in the previous section, when adding the infobox to [[negri]], I found the ploidacot appears as tetracot, but it should be omega-tetracot. Also, when I tried to use 15/8 as the generator, after adding the generator size, the infobox broke completely. It should also properly link EDOs using alternate vals in the EDO join, which doesn't work as seen in [[archon]], and may be a problem in other temperaments like [[squares]] (14c&17c) as well, though 31&45 is also plausible. Overall, there are a lot of bugs.--[[User:Overthink\|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink\|talk]]) 17:54, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

	As mentioned in the previous section, when adding the infobox to [[negri]], I found the ploidacot appears as tetracot, but it should be omega-tetracot. Also, when I tried to use 15/8 as the generator, after adding the generator size, the infobox broke completely. It should also properly link EDOs using alternate vals in the EDO join, which doesn't work as seen in [[archon]], and may be a problem in other temperaments like [[squares]] (14c&17c) as well, though 31&45 is also plausible. Overall, there are a lot of bugs.--[[User:~~Overthink~~\|~~Overthink~~]] ([[User talk:~~Overthink~~\|talk]]) 17:54, ~~11 November~~ 2025 (UTC)		: Resolved. —[[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 14:10, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:49, 11 November 2025
Line 30:		Line 30:
	The correct ploidacot for decimal is diploid dicot. This template gives diploid alpha-dicot. Something to do with the algorithm in the module. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 08:57, 23 October 2025 (UTC)		The correct ploidacot for decimal is diploid dicot. This template gives diploid alpha-dicot. Something to do with the algorithm in the module. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 08:57, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
	: Also, acot doesn't work properly. In the infobox for [[blackwood]], I made the first zero as <code><nowiki><small><big>0</big></small></nowiki></code>, as putting a zero at the start creates an error. I believe the infobox read the mapping as "5; 1 0" rather than "5; 0 1 0", and I overrid the ploidacot. I tried to re-add the infobox to [[bixby]] with the small big zero trick, but this time it doesn't work, as it reads the mapping as "1", which may be the reason there's an error. In general, the mapping code need to be reworked.--[[User:Overthink\|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink\|talk]]) 21:50, 23 October 2025 (UTC)		: Also, acot doesn't work properly. In the infobox for [[blackwood]], I made the first zero as <code><nowiki><small><big>0</big></small></nowiki></code>, as putting a zero at the start creates an error. I believe the infobox read the mapping as "5; 1 0" rather than "5; 0 1 0", and I overrid the ploidacot. I tried to re-add the infobox to [[bixby]] with the small big zero trick, but this time it doesn't work, as it reads the mapping as "1", which may be the reason there's an error. In general, the mapping code need to be reworked.--[[User:Overthink\|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink\|talk]]) 21:50, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
			: When adding the infobox to [[negri]], I found the ploidacot appears as tetracot, but it should be omega-tetracot.--[[User:Overthink\|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink\|talk]]) 17:49, 11 November 2025 (UTC)