Template talk:Infobox ET - Revision history

Overthink: /* No-twos consistency for EDTs */ new section

2025-10-15T03:43:20Z

No-twos consistency for EDTs: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:43, 15 October 2025
Line 242:		Line 242:

	: Done. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 18:34, 4 August 2025 (UTC)		: Done. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 18:34, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

			== No-twos consistency for EDTs ==

			Adding no-twos consistency for EDTs has been mentioned on [[Xenharmonic_Wiki:Things_to_do]], but still no one has added this yet. Someone should add it as soon as possible.--[[User:Overthink\|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink\|talk]]) 03:43, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

Fredg999: /* Make zeta optional */ Done

2025-08-04T18:34:22Z

Make zeta optional: Done

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:34, 4 August 2025
Line 240:		Line 240:

	– [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 17:46, 4 August 2025 (UTC)		– [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 17:46, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

			: Done. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 18:34, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Sintel: /* Make zeta optional */ new section

2025-08-04T17:46:12Z

Make zeta optional: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:46, 4 August 2025
Line 234:		Line 234:

	[[User:Matěȷ\|Matěȷ]] ([[User talk:Matěȷ\|talk]]) 19:16, 6 April 2025 (UTC)		[[User:Matěȷ\|Matěȷ]] ([[User talk:Matěȷ\|talk]]) 19:16, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

			== Make zeta optional ==

			As has been discussed before, I don't believe zeta list status is worth being so prominantly displayed in the infobox. Preferably this information is made opt-in and thereby turned off for most of the edo pages.

			– [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 17:46, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Matěȷ: Added comment about step size of 0EDO

2025-04-06T19:16:32Z

Added comment about step size of 0EDO

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:16, 6 April 2025
Line 226:		Line 226:

	: It should be possible, although I will note that only edos are supported in xen-calc (i.e. nonoctave equal tunings are not supported), and large edos will either take a long time to load; for instance, 1000edo just took me 30 seconds to load. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 02:51, 8 October 2024 (UTC)		: It should be possible, although I will note that only edos are supported in xen-calc (i.e. nonoctave equal tunings are not supported), and large edos will either take a long time to load; for instance, 1000edo just took me 30 seconds to load. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 02:51, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

			== Wrong step size at 0EDO ==

			{{Infobox ET\|0edo\|debug=1}}

			This template shows step size 0 ¢ for 0EDO [[Single-pitch tuning]]. That is wrong because it is either undefined because of division by zero or infinity as a limit of ‹x›EDO for ‹x› going to zero. To be consistent with the article, I think that it should show step size ∞ ¢. The article says “As a result of the step size of 0edo being infinite, the relative error of all intervals is zero.”.

			[[User:Matěȷ\|Matěȷ]] ([[User talk:Matěȷ\|talk]]) 19:16, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

FloraC: Set debug (= uncategorize) for the example here and update the status

2025-01-09T11:49:30Z

Set debug (= uncategorize) for the example here and update the status

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:49, 9 January 2025
Line 209:		Line 209:

	== Ed4 navigation ==		== Ed4 navigation ==
			{{Infobox ET\|5ed4\|debug=1}}

	~~{{Infobox ET\|5ed4}}~~
	At the moment, if you are on a page for an ed4, say for example 5ed4, then the the "'''<--'''" and "'''-->'''" links will link to '''4ed4''' and '''6ed4''', both of which will immediately redirect you to the relevant edo page (2edo or 3edo):		At the moment, if you are on a page for an ed4, say for example 5ed4, then the the "'''<--'''" and "'''-->'''" links will link to '''4ed4''' and '''6ed4''', both of which will immediately redirect you to the relevant edo page (2edo or 3edo):

Line 218:		Line 218:

	--[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 07:29, 24 June 2023 (UTC)		--[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 07:29, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

			: As of now, this is resolved for ed4's, ed9's, and ed9/4's. Ed8's may still link to edos. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 11:49, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

	== Automatic link to xen-calc? ==		== Automatic link to xen-calc? ==

Fredg999: /* Automatic link to xen-calc? */ Re

2024-10-08T02:51:10Z

Automatic link to xen-calc?: Re

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:51, 8 October 2024
Line 222:		Line 222:

	Would it be hard to add an automatic to xen-calc like the template for intervals has? (Something like "Open this temperament in xen-calc".) [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 22:15, 7 October 2024 (UTC)		Would it be hard to add an automatic to xen-calc like the template for intervals has? (Something like "Open this temperament in xen-calc".) [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 22:15, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

			: It should be possible, although I will note that only edos are supported in xen-calc (i.e. nonoctave equal tunings are not supported), and large edos will either take a long time to load; for instance, 1000edo just took me 30 seconds to load. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 02:51, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

Lucius Chiaraviglio: /* Automatic link to xen-calc? */ new section

2024-10-07T22:15:58Z

Automatic link to xen-calc?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:15, 7 October 2024
Line 218:		Line 218:

	--[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 07:29, 24 June 2023 (UTC)		--[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 07:29, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

			== Automatic link to xen-calc? ==

			Would it be hard to add an automatic to xen-calc like the template for intervals has? (Something like "Open this temperament in xen-calc".) [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 22:15, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

BudjarnLambeth: Slightly clarified/reworded what I was saying

2023-07-01T00:56:51Z

Slightly clarified/reworded what I was saying

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:56, 1 July 2023
Line 211:		Line 211:

	{{Infobox ET\|5ed4}}		{{Infobox ET\|5ed4}}
	At the moment, if you are on a page for an ed4, say for example 5ed4, then the the "<--" and "-->" links will link to 4ed4 and 6ed4, both of which will immediately redirect you to the relevant edo page (2edo or 3edo):		At the moment, if you are on a page for an ed4, say for example 5ed4, then the the "'''<--'''" and "'''-->'''" links will link to '''4ed4''' and '''6ed4''', both of which will immediately redirect you to the relevant edo page (2edo or 3edo):

	I think this is a bit of a hinderance for navigation. It would be more helpful, I think, for "<--" and "-->" to link to 3ed4 and 7ed4, instead of 4ed4 and 6ed4.		I think this is a bit of a hinderance for navigation. It would be more helpful, I think, for "'''<--'''" and "'''-->'''" to link to '''3ed4''' and '''7ed4''', instead of 4ed4 and 6ed4.

	Similar problems ~~likely~~ also occur with ed6, ed8, ed10, etc., I haven't checked.		Similar problems may also occur with other non-prime EDs (ed6, ed8, ed9, ed10, etc.), I haven't checked.

	--[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 07:29, 24 June 2023 (UTC)		--[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 07:29, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

BudjarnLambeth: /* Ed4 navigation */ new section

2023-06-24T07:29:48Z

Ed4 navigation: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:29, 24 June 2023
Line 207:		Line 207:

	The template shows [[9240edo]] as highly composite, yet it's not a member of the highly composite sequence, it's only largely composite. Also, past 5040 the sequences split into highly composite and superabundant so it would be worthy to get this noted. [[User:Eliora\|Eliora]] ([[User talk:Eliora\|talk]]) 23:17, 17 March 2023 (UTC)		The template shows [[9240edo]] as highly composite, yet it's not a member of the highly composite sequence, it's only largely composite. Also, past 5040 the sequences split into highly composite and superabundant so it would be worthy to get this noted. [[User:Eliora\|Eliora]] ([[User talk:Eliora\|talk]]) 23:17, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

			== Ed4 navigation ==

			{{Infobox ET\|5ed4}}
			At the moment, if you are on a page for an ed4, say for example 5ed4, then the the "<--" and "-->" links will link to 4ed4 and 6ed4, both of which will immediately redirect you to the relevant edo page (2edo or 3edo):

			I think this is a bit of a hinderance for navigation. It would be more helpful, I think, for "<--" and "-->" to link to 3ed4 and 7ed4, instead of 4ed4 and 6ed4.

			Similar problems likely also occur with ed6, ed8, ed10, etc., I haven't checked.

			--[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 07:29, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Fredg999: /* Reduce parameters */ re

2023-05-25T22:11:50Z

Reduce parameters: re

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:11, 25 May 2023
Line 193:		Line 193:

	::: The only thing I can think of as a use for a modified version of the M3 line is as the representation for [[5/4]] for systems that have a consistent representation of it- and this merely because 5/4 is such a common reference point for major thirds. I wouldn't bother with those systems where 5/4 can reasonably be mapped to one of two possible EDO-steps. Other than that, I do indeed think that adding the M3 line is questionable. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 15:31, 25 May 2023 (UTC)		::: The only thing I can think of as a use for a modified version of the M3 line is as the representation for [[5/4]] for systems that have a consistent representation of it- and this merely because 5/4 is such a common reference point for major thirds. I wouldn't bother with those systems where 5/4 can reasonably be mapped to one of two possible EDO-steps. Other than that, I do indeed think that adding the M3 line is questionable. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 15:31, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

			:::: There's the prime harmonics table for that, and assuming the diatonic major third to be consistent with 5/4 is very meantone-centric anyway. The semitone ratio is already plenty of information. I agree that the M3 field should be removed, because it adds more clutter for no new significant information. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 22:11, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

	== Consistency level ==		== Consistency level ==