https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3ATree_of_rank_two_temperaments%2FWikispacesArchiveTalk:Tree of rank two temperaments/WikispacesArchive - Revision history2026-07-15T09:24:27ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.43.6https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Tree_of_rank_two_temperaments/WikispacesArchive&diff=35010&oldid=prevMike Battaglia: 1 revision imported: Moving archived Wikispaces discussion to subpage2018-10-01T18:01:50Z<p>1 revision imported: Moving archived Wikispaces discussion to subpage</p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="1" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="1" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 18:01, 1 October 2018</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-notice" lang="en"><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div>
</td></tr></table>Mike Battagliahttps://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Tree_of_rank_two_temperaments/WikispacesArchive&diff=35009&oldid=prevWikispaces>FREEZE at 18:01, 1 October 20182018-10-01T18:01:16Z<p></p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>{{WSArchiveHeader}}<br />
<br />
<br />
== Jamesbond, Catler, etc. ==<br />
Are temperaments such as Jamesbond and Catler going to be omitted from this tree because they become rank-1 when restricted to the 5 limit?<br />
<br />
They're perfectly good rank-2 temperaments in the 7 limit.<br />
<br />
- '''keenanpepper''' December 01, 2011, 01:58:41 AM UTC-0800<br />
----<br />
You can see what I did with omicronbeta. Do you think that is a good approach?<br />
<br />
- '''genewardsmith''' December 01, 2011, 07:34:00 AM UTC-0800<br />
----<br />
Maybe a better on would be to have a top level of 7edo, 12edo, 31edo, 72edo etc temperaments when the badness figures are low enough to warrent it.<br />
<br />
- '''genewardsmith''' December 01, 2011, 07:45:05 AM UTC-0800<br />
----<br />
<br />
== What is this? ==<br />
What makes this a tree? What are the numbers; some kind of badness?<br />
<br />
- '''keenanpepper''' November 28, 2011, 02:46:34 AM UTC-0800<br />
----<br />
it's also an orphaned page :-(<br />
<br />
- '''xenwolf''' November 28, 2011, 03:06:56 AM UTC-0800<br />
----<br />
It's a work in progress. The numbers are logflat badness, and what makes it a tree is hypertext.<br />
<br />
- '''genewardsmith''' November 28, 2011, 09:50:49 AM UTC-0800<br />
----<br />
I meant what logically makes it a tree, rather than, say, a directed acyclic graph.<br />
<br />
- '''keenanpepper''' November 28, 2011, 11:00:42 AM UTC-0800<br />
----<br />
See if the explanation I've put at the top helps.<br />
<br />
- '''genewardsmith''' November 28, 2011, 10:04:49 PM UTC-0800<br />
----<br />
Would it be perhaps helpful if I coded up a nice JS interface for this, allowing you to show and hide branches from the tree? That way we'd only have one page instead of a hundred.<br />
<br />
- '''mbattaglia1''' November 29, 2011, 11:02:50 PM UTC-0800<br />
----<br />
That sounds like a fine idea, but would it be editable?<br />
<br />
- '''genewardsmith''' November 29, 2011, 11:25:45 PM UTC-0800<br />
----<br />
Sure, but I'm still trying to figure out exactly what you have in mind with this; it's quite mysterious for now. This is basically a list of 5-limit temperaments, and then you click on one and it shows you all the children, right?<br />
<br />
- '''mbattaglia1''' November 29, 2011, 11:31:15 PM UTC-0800<br />
----</div>Wikispaces>FREEZE